EVOLUTIONARY LIGHTNING STRIKES OUT, AGAIN.

In an article published on online recently, the readers were made aware that

"Lightning strikes on the early Earth over the course of 1 billion years could have been key to the formation of the first life on our planet, according to a new study." 

So, what was this "new study" about? It certainly did not reveal a scientific fact, and the proof of that is their admission that his "could have been the key to the formation of the first life on our planet." The use of the conditional past tense implies they do not know for sure, new study and all, which makes one wonder why as a scientist make a public statement about what might have happen. According to English language rules, "conditional grammar expresses an idea that is not real. It did not happen." As a result, this group of scientists was sharing with the world a "novel" idea that was not real, the assumption that lightning might have started a process that led to the appearance of life on planet Earth. The subliminal admission there was that after more than 160 years from the time Darwin published On the Origin of Species, with them claiming over and over on all channels this is a revolutionary work by a revolutionary mind, they still do not know what caused the appearance of life on this planet or anywhere else in the universe for that matter. Sure enough, as you are going to see in A Time of Change, On the Origin of Species is not about the origin of species. 

For those who pay attention to the meaning of the words, the title of the paper reveals the study does not come even close to explaining the formation of the first life forms. It only suggests, key word, repeat lightning strikes over 1 billion years might have been "a major facilitator of prebiotic phosphorus reduction on early Earth." That is an assumed development. Nevertheless, they suppose it opened the door to a process of evolution that over millions and millions of year has produced, they say, the amazing diversity of life forms we have today on this planet, thousands of different mammals, reptiles, birds, fishes, insects, and yes, humans too. Except that, contrary to what the evolutionists are claiming, there is zero evidence that process really took place. Despite that, they teach evolution in schools and universities as if it were science fact while for more than a decade now churches decided it would be good for business to endorse evolution and praise Darwin all the way to the imaginary kingdom of what is now a gradualist God. They did that afraid, and rightfully so that the reality of intelligent design is going to make the entire dogma of religion collapse as a house of cards, so, we ended up with both creationists and evolutionists rejecting design. 

There is another aspect of what we have hear that needs to be addressed. The same article says, 

"The new study — in the journal Nature Communications — suggests trillions of lightning strikes spanning about 1 billion years helped create phosphorous, a key ingredient in the formation of life." 

(Lightning strikes as a major facilitator of prebiotic phosphorus reduction on early Earth, by Benjamin L. Hess, Sandra Piazolo, Jason Harvey, March 16, 2021) (axios.com)

Nature Communications is an open access science journal, and that calls for us to be extremely circumspect about the validity of everything published under its patronage. Open access means, you pay, they publish your paper, then your paper and you as its author gains some measure of popularity because it has appeared in a science journal. As a result, you can claim now you are a published researcher. This opens the door to book publishing and to the lecturing circuit where you will diligently promote your book on something that is perceived as been peer reviewed even though no one known if this was the case or not. In addition to that, precisely what we have in this instance, somebody with an agenda is going to quote from your published paper to make a point in line with the old reality-defying adagio saying evolution is fact, fact, fact, as the good people of Axios did. In other words, you pay to have a so-called research paper stating something false labeled science that someone else would reference to make the case for evolution even though reality tells a different story about biological gradualism and about the history of life on this planet in general.

Most open access science journals claim they peer-review every single submission.They do not. A less known fact by the large public, there are huge problems with peer reviewing. How huge? There have been a number of tests conducted by certain scientific organizations and journals to make sure the open access system is credible and reliable, and the results were not exactly reassuring. 

One of those tests was conducted a few years ago by Science magazine. It used a spoof cancer study containing errors any honest reviewer would have easily caught. A significant number of open access science journals agreed to publish it, over one hundred of them. There is money to be made in the scientific paper publishing business too, and while they claimed they were peer-reviewing everything published, many of them did not and they published the faulty study the way it was, errors and all. There are close to 12,000 open access journals in America alone, and there is a strong possibility this was not the only instance when a faulty study claimed to have been peer-reviewed when in reality it was not was published.

About this "new study" on the effect lightning might have had on the appearance of life on Earth, Benjamin Hess, one of the authors of the paper declared that, “This work helps us understand how life may have formed on Earth and how it could still be forming on other Earth-like planets.” The first problem with his claim that jumps right at you aside from the already mentioned here problem with evolutionists always making "may have" and "could" as part of their argument, meaning their input is only an assumption is that the new theory was actually decades old, something the majority of the public would not know. This makes one also question the real intent of those involved in the study, and related to that, their honesty. 

According to an article published in Sky News in 2016,

"For nearly nine decades, science’s favorite explanation for the origin of life has been the “primordial soup”. This is the idea that life began from a series of chemical reactions in a warm pond on Earth’s surface, triggered by an external energy source such as lightning strike or ultraviolet (UV) light." (Have We Been Wrong About Life's Origin, by Arunas L. Radzvilavicius, at the time a Postdoctoral Researcher in Evolutionary Biology with the University of Pennsylvania.) 

To give the theory of evolution an otherwise false aura of academic legitimacy, biology is no longer just biology, it is "Evolutionary Biology," and yet no one could tell the difference, in a rational way that is. 

Other than that, the fact is the "lightening theory" was thrown around for many years now, meaning at the best the authors of the "new study" were assuming the same thing others have been assuming for decades, with no one having evidence this was what happened, leads us to asking the same question asked before: What was the real reason for publishing and discussing the results of a "new study" that is neither new, nor a real study. Are we to believe the scientists associated with this farce were completely in the dark about the fact that in the past 100 years other scientists would once in a while propose the same thing, that lightning may have caused life to miraculously appear on our planet, and that same as the authors of the new study none of them had any idea if this did, indeed, happen?

They assume things all the time, could have/may have, and that is because they either have no idea what happened or do not want to share with the public what they know about what really happened. Evolutionists are confidently throwing around such non-factual concepts as abiogenesis, something supposedly describing the spontaneous birth of life forms from chemicals and other amorphous material, which is as much of a miracle as the six-day creation in the Genesis is, and speciation, which is imaginary gradual evolution spelled differently. In reality, and as basically even the authors of this study admit, no one knows how life has appeared on our planet, a reminder of the fact that, indeed, Darwin's On the Origin of the Species does not address the question of the origin of species and that the title of his book is a false label placed on an empty box. 

Most everyone in the scientific community would agree, off the record of course, the claim that gradual biological evolution could occur spontaneously in nature and that on top of everything else it occurred at a slow pace over millions of years does not just defy common sense. It is biologically and genetically impossible, and one does not need to be a biologist or a geneticist to be able to understand that. Basic common sense does the trick just fine. 

Random natural events do not code genetic information, which is what we have in the case of the DNA and of other genetic devices, nor could an assumed process of adaptation generate coherent changes in an existing genetic code during the life of the species. Only a genetic engineer could do that. Then there is the indisputable fact that, to be able to reproduce as a species and this perpetuate the species, you would have to have all you organs together and in working condition from day one of your setting foot on this planet, separate male and separate female sex organs included. If you don't have the reproduction organs, and this is known as the queen of all problems for the theory of evolution, you are the last generation of your species. 

According to evolutionists, all your species' organs have been in a transitional stage for millions of years. The meaning of that is you were a non-functioning species for all that time. That defies common sense. In line with that, it means  natural selection, otherwise an imaginary process, had nothing of value to hold on to, to preserve. A rational logical conclusion, neither gradual mutations, nor natural election happened. 

As publicly admitted even by some of those on-again, off-again supporters of Darwinism, with American evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould making a strong case against evolution only to be forced by editorial staff serving the protectors of the status quo to declare evolution fact, there has been a code of silence imposed on scientists on this subject, something similar to the UFO phenomenon and the contacts we made for thousands of years with extraterrestrials being a taboo topic for the media. Albert Einstein, for example, who was not just a brilliant scientist but also a philosopher, would weigh in on all sorts of topics of human interest. He has never discussed evolution publicly, one way or the other, and yet we know for a fact he was well-aware of the controversy. 

The code of silence imposed and enforced by the academia, the reason for that is one does not want to give comfort to creationists, resulted in only scientists entertaining beliefs in the existence of some kind of higher power being heard speaking publicly against evolution, and even though some of them are Nobel Prize recipients in all sorts of science related fields, the evolution propaganda machine calls them creationists and invites the public to dismiss their otherwise valid scientific argument against gradualism. 

These days a Catholic Church and a Church of England supposedly working for that delusion God, as described by Richard Dawkins, the front man of the pro-evolution cabala within the academia, have officially endorsed evolution, and Atheist Dawkins cheerfully interviews men of God, in the house of God, who now say evolution is fact and that intelligent design should not be taught in schools. As you are going to see, they do not do that because they sincerely believe evolution is fact, almost no one out there truly believes that and we have the Gallup polls to prove it. They do it because they realized a public aware of the true meaning of the reality of intelligent design would have catastrophic consequences for the existence of their religious institutions, reason why they joined the evolutionists in Dover, Pennsylvania, where in 2005, a judge appointed by someone behind the government put a what in fact was an unconstitutional ban on discussing ID in schools. The actual reason why they would rather endorse evolution then have intelligent design discussed in science class is that they too want to protect a status quo the survival of their multi-billion-dollar preaching of irrational belief industry depends on. 

Creationists and evolutionists were equally happy when at the end of that 2005 sham trial, a judge of no scientific expertise declared evolution fact and officially banned, as planned, discussing intelligent design in public schools under the false pretense that ID was religion. This was no normal judicial process, and the entities behind our government needed the ban because intelligent design stands exactly for what Francis Crick, co-discoverer of the DNA and Nobel Prize recipient for that had declared in his 1981 book Life Itself about the origin of the DNA: The DNA is not from Earth. It was created by an advanced civilization and was brought here for the purpose of preserving a special knowledge by the way of an experiment that was to result in the most advanced civilization in the entire universe.

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 

BERTRAND RUSSELL: IMMORTALITY AND SOUL

Of a religious, political, or of any other nature for that matter, humans taking sides in a debate that turned into a dispute accept by default as true every single claim made by the members of their adopted community. Also by default, they cry "False!" about everything stated by an opposition they were made to see as the enemy. The mentality behind that kind of attitude is, we are always right and the others are always wrong. To the unattached observer, since they are not seen through an ideological filter, things are the way they look. 

In line with this at times annoying reality, not everything stated by a human universally accepted as being an evil person is false, and not everything ever written or claimed by someone whose knowledge and judgement society has come to admire is true. Let us take, for example, the case of British philosopher Bertrand Russell and his opinion on immortality and soul.

The focus here is going to be on his What Is the Soul? A piece he apparently originally wrote in 1928, there is an 1947 and a 1957 version of it and while he made several stylistic and terminology related adjustments, one thing these three versions have in common is him being wrong about mind/soul and physical body being one and the same thing.   

In the 1928 version, right from the beginning Russell admits that "When I was young we all knew, or thought we knew, that a man consists of a soul and a body." Not all people knew that but this is what he thought was the case. What happened next, apparently unbeknownst to him, an extremely reductionist materialist segment of the scientific community hijacked the conversation, something done under the guise of addressing the false claims made in religion about the immortality of the body, not of the soul though. Indeed, only a few would notice, Bertrand included, when in the middle of a heated debate, that the immortality of the body is something completely different from the immortality of the soul.

'The rising of the dead' still preached in many churches implies that currently dead human bodies will one day rise in spirit and body from their grave, the other rather vague implication being that the soul and the body are one. In essence, the position taken by reductionist materialist scientists and church theologians is similar, and much to many rationalists' disbelief they are more than once on the same page. The only difference consists in the kinds of stories they tell about what both erroneously describe as fact. 

The way empiricists have found it fit to address this rising of the dead nonsense in the Bible was by assuming that either such a thing as soul does not exist, or that since the soul and the body are one, when the body decomposes after our passing, so does the soul. The soul, however, is energy, and as the First Law of Thermodynamics says, energy can neither be created, nor destroyed. It can only be altered in form, transformed in a different kind of energy. In other words, soul energy is immortal, and since we are the soul within the body, we too are immortal. The immortality of the soul, on one hand, and the impossible immortality of the body, on the other hand, preached by some religious institutions but not by a Paul who, as you are going to see in the book, in one of his letters rightfully declares that the perishable could not ascend as imperishable, are different notions materialist scientists participating in the effort to protect the status quo by, among others, keeping Earth-humans unaware of their spiritual nature decided to treat as one and the same thing. 

Without a doubt, not only that materialist evolutionists and theologians are wrong about the soul, the fact that they both directly or indirectly deny the reality of a soul residing within the body but being apart from the body, as well as the immortality of the soul is no accident. One major way of controlling the people of the planet, this was a coordinated misrepresentation of the true nature of being human, part of a scheme meant to hide from the Earth-humans their true potential. This false perception of reality determines the way they live, the way they understand their relation to the out there, the consequence of that being the state of almost constant state of crisis humankind has been experiencing for thousands of years. 

With the advent of quantum physics, many scientists would conclude now material reality is not really material, or real, and that what we perceive as material is a holographic multi-dimensional projection, a mind over "matter" phenomenon. In plain words, the observed at the sensory level material reality, something that is nothing but energy, is basically an illusion. As a result, philosophers relying heavily on good science were of the opinion now that, in a sense, the body too was a product of the mind, and that meant the mind was something apart from the body. However, as Russell admits in 1928 without drawing the rational logical conclusion, "The philosopher (...) was not taken seriously, and science remained comfortably materialistic." Same as others at the time and even later, he would not realize that not everyone within the scientific community was "materialistic," with some theoretical physicists, by 1925 we would enter the modern quantum theory era, making actually a very strong case for intelligent design, on one hand, and for the origin of what we perceive as material being in a non-physical phenomenon, on the other, a non-physical phenomenon subdued by some of the members of highly advanced cosmic civilizations that have in contact with us for thousands of years. Some quantum physicists would make a scientific argument for the existence of the soul and for consciousness, the essential aspect of all life forms and the true creator of what we only perceive as a material world. 

Russell navigates at times aimlessly an extremely choppy sea of conflicting ideas, and not once does he mention consciousness. He works, in this instance, with what some had to say on the question of the existence of the soul: "physicists assure us that there is not such thing as matter, and psychologists assure us that there is no such thing as mind." And while under other circumstances (What I Believe, 1925) he would make the case that mental activity is all about chemicals and electrical impulses, he admits now that "there are, however, various difficulties in the way of reducing mental activity to physical activity." As you are going to see in A Time of Change, there is an explanation for how mental activity translates into physical activity, which happens to be a very interesting process the awareness of which is going to give one access to powers many out there did not know we posses, no thanks to our education system, the academia, or the institution of religion. Then within the same paragraph, he makes a stunning claim concerning our physical aspect: "What we can say, on the basis of physics itself, is that what we have hitherto called our body is really an elaborate scientific construction not corresponding to any physical reality." 

As shocking a claim as that may be, it is demonstrably true. It is hard to tell if he meant it this way or not, but this is the true meaning of the reality of intelligent design, reason why both creationists and evolutionists do not want design discussed in schools, colleges, and universities, with Russell being no fan of religion. He describes the human body as a work of science and not as a product of biblical or evolutionary miracles, at the same time realizing the process behind this science is associated with some non-physical reality. Once again, he was correct about that. However, Russell somehow concludes that "modern science gives no indication whatsoever of the existence of the soul or mind as an entity." Regarding this matter he was wrong. In his defense, at the time humankind was still in the middle of a dense dark age, one we are only now about to leave forever behind. 

It is obvious that same as other materialists, Russell was looking for empirical evidence, for something he could detect with the help of measuring devices that would have proved the existence of the soul. If they could only weigh the soul. Someone did try that, they found out the soul was weighing 21 grams, and then they found out that they were dead wrong about that. The soul and the spiritual in general is energy vibrating at much higher frequencies when compared to the frequencies of the material, frequencies that are inaccessible to our sensory and because of that to our current measuring devices. Energy does not have mass. As a result, a rational logical interpretation of what is observable, there is other kind of evidence attesting to the existence of an independent from the body soul. 

After analyzing almost 4,000 cases over four decades, that kind of rational interpretation of indisputable evidence led scientists with the University of Virginia to conclude reincarnation is real, the significance of their finding being the soul is something real. Then we have the new science of transpersonal psychology establishing that consciousness is, indeed, high frequency energy apart from the body. 

Had Russell lived for another decade or so, he would have become familiar with how computers work. Computers function based on the same principle everything else in the universe operates on, a principle that was out there from the moment the universe was born. Something acknowledged by many along the time, the human body is a perfect mirror of the universe. As a result, similar to the software making the hard drive into an operational computer, when at birth and not a moment earlier the soul is downloaded to our physical aspect, it turns the new human body into a human being. This is why what we really are is the immortal, the eternal soul energy within the body and not the ephemeral body.

Because he believes that what some call soul or mind is one with the body, and Einstein appeared to have a similar opinion, though as you are going to see, he was misunderstood, Russell is firmly convinced that "There can not be reason for supposing that either a piece of mind or a piece of matter is immortal." His reasoning is based on a number of false assumptions, such as the notion that "the most essential characteristic of mind is memory." The fact is, as most everyone knows today, mind and matter are two different kinds of energies, and what is most significant about that is that they are operating at different frequencies. He then argues that since basically everything related to memory is associated with the brain, another thing that, as you are going to see in A Time of Change is not true, since "this structure decays at death, there is every reason to suppose that memory also must cease." Again, the soul is energy, and the First Law of Thermodynamics states that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Energy is emanated from a source, and in the case of the soul, its energy was emanated from the Source all energy of everything there is in this and other universes has emanated from, a Source, a super-consciousness some call Prime Creator while others erroneously call God.

Like most materialists, Russell embraces the position that life is limited to whatever happens between birth and death, and that everything beyond that is completely inconsequential: "we shall have to admit that what is going to happen many millions of years hence has no very great emotional interest for us here and now." It actually does. Past present and future are part of the same space-time continuum, and even though we all live in the present, we are always persuaded in our choices of here and now by what us and humankind has experienced in the past and by what we envision regarding how our personal and the future of civilization Earth should look like.  

Not only that but everything we have experienced in the past and everything we experience in the present is in line with what we as spiritual entities must accomplish in the end within this lower world of the Natural Order of Creation. 

(Edited January 2, 2024)

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 

PANIS ANGELICUS: A CHURCH SONG DEDICATED TO A MADE UP STORY

All humans are inherently entitled to follow the path they choose to follow in their life. That said, to this day, in houses of worship they continue to read from books the people are told God himself, and that could not be further from the truth. The original Gnostic churches, on the other hand, were houses of learning, not of worship. When the institution of religion was created, its purpose was to disallow access to learning opportunities to a majority of the population of the planet. From the beginning, the church of religion became a place where the people were asked to worship human-like gods in the sky the priests claimed to be their representatives on Earth. That state of affairs had and still has a malefic effect on the development of civilization Earth, and since they were  indoctrinated with irrational religious belief from an early age, until recently the people would not know there is an alternative to that fictional reality.

You may have heard Panis Angelicus performed by Andrea Bocelli or Luciano Pavaroti, and there is a very good chance you liked it. Harmonious sound is pleasing to the senses, to the entire body, and because of that we at times do not pay attention to the message of the song, something that becomes infused in our subconscious when we not pay attention and take things for granted. To give an example, many singers give Leonard Cohen's song Hallelujah a very emotional religious interpretation. The lyrics, however, are a sarcastic reference to religious belief. If you are a religious person, you may have also liked this Panis Angelicus, and yet most likely you did not know the story behind the story it tells. 

The song is the last stanza of a hymn called Sacris solemniis written in the 13th century by Thomas Aquinas, they hold him to be a saint yet no one knows why, dedicated to the feast of Corpus Christi, the Solemnity of the Holy Body and Blood of Christ. As if that was not creepy enough, the title of the song translates by Bread of Angels, and while its lyrics do not directly state the bread is the body of Christ, they imply it, an obvious reference to the passage in the Bible known as the last supper. There, the apostles are told the bread on the table is the body of Jesus and the wine in the cup is Jesus' blood. Again, pretty creepy if you think about it, but this is what the text says and this is what they preach in churches. As a consequence of that this is what many people indoctrinated with church dogma from a time in their life when they could not tell true from false believe. They even have a little waffle so they could experience every Sunday the chewing and the digesting of the body of Christ, and then they are given a small cup of red wine representing blood, so that in there manipulated imagination they drink Jesus' blood.

What most churchgoers are not aware of for they were never told the real story, is that the ritual that in church Christianity is known as Eucharist is based on two non-Christian traditions that have nothing in common with the life of the one known under the name of Jesus. At the time the non-Christian Christian church was emerging its founders were known as the Adversaries, as in the adversaries of the true Christology promoted at the original secular Christian school of thought. In line with that they were also adversaries of Jesus' anti-religion message. 

In those days, the masses were celebrating Goddess Ceres, the patron of agriculture, by making and eating bread cakes that represented the "body of the goddess." They were also celebrating God Dionysus by drinking wine that supposedly was "the blood of the god." Church Christianity came up with a better one, a fantasy story meant to bring Dionysus and Ceres worshipers under its monopolistic tent. That was to give the bishops of the church more political power while at the same time enabling them to make substantial financial gains. 

A constant craving for money and power is the defining aspect of the entire history of the church and of profiteers of religion in general all the way to today's multi-millionaire evangelists. Something else churchgoers are not aware of, the initial basis for this non-Christian church Eucharist was the another fabricated story, the one about Jesus dying on the cross for our sins. As you are going to see, we find evidence across the cultural spectrum of Middle East and Far East, India and Tibet in particular, none of that happen, and even today's Bibles acknowledge in some left unedited passages that Jesus was of a relative old age when he was debating the Pharisees. The very claim that God gave his one and only son to death to save the world is based on a Jewish tradition much older than the time of Jesus. Most importantly, as you are going to see, it makes absolutely no sense.

The last supper story is a made up story, and this made up story is what the harmonious, the pleasing to our senses Panes Angelicus hymn is based on. It was meant as a way of incorporating in church dogma traditions associated with older religions at the time when the bishops were seeking to establish a monopoly on the business of religion and this way make church Christianity the one and only religion in the empire. In fact, as you are going to see in A Time of Change, there is absolutely nothing genuinely Christian in curch Christianity, or true for that matter.

(Last edit: January 2, 2024)

* * *

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

SOPHIA AND THE CHURCH OF THE DARK AGE

During the editing process, on occasion I would remove text that while interesting, I found it to represent a diversion from the topic at hand, this way disrupting the flow of the argument. This was the case with the story about the St. Sophia Church in Istanbul, Turkey. What follows is no longer part of the manuscript. To the original and now excised from the book discussion I added here context that clarifies certain points made in the book about the institution of religion under different circumstances.

&.

The word philosophy comes from the Greek philo sophia, meaning love of wisdom. A rather strange fact considering that same as in the case of Orthodox Judaism, based on the story of Adam and Eve in the Bible and the Torah in the Christian religion too knowledge is associated with the otherwise made-up notion of capital sin, one of the most impressive Christian churches ever was Saint Sophia. Also known as the Great Church, or the Church of the Divine Wisdom, it was built in Constantinople, Byzantium, today's Istanbul, Turkey, between 532 and 537 CE. Numerous fires and earthquakes have repeatedly destroyed it along the time. It was rebuilt, destroyed again, rebuilt again, and eventually it changed owners. Today, that church is known as Hagia Sophia.

The history of this coveted monumental construction mirrors in many ways the history of humans on this planet once religious institutions took over their communities. From that moment on their life would be marred by thousands of years of religious wars, with many of those wars still going on today. In line with that when the Christian church came to prominence after a group known as the Adversaries seceded from the secular original Christian school of thought to create a new religious institution with the intent of establishing a monopoly on the business of religion, communities across the Middle East and Europe would be terrorized by the constant infighting between different Christian sects and by the violence perpetrated by the so-called Universal Church on competing religions and on secular schools of thought. 

The history of the demise and the reinstatement of power under new authority of the St. Sophia Church is also a reflection of the fact that from the beginning those claiming to be intercessors of God were actually using the institution of religion to facilitate the mental and physical enslavement of Earth-humans by the Custodial authorities, the entities that at one time took over by force an experiment known in some circles as Project Earth. The priests were calling themselves "intercessors of God," and they still do, when in reality this God was the chief archon, the very human leader of a group of non-terrestrial colonists. In other words, they were the Custodial authorities' henchmen.

After the fall of Constantinople in 1453, in the spirit of Muhammad’s all-inclusive Constitution of Medina, contrary to popular belief the conquering Muslims did not suppress Christianity or the Christian people. They allowed them to not just exist but thrive in the city. Eventually, more radical leaders would take over this supposedly Christian church and made it into a mosque. In 1928, an amendment to the Turkish Constitution was establishing now that Islam was no longer a state religion, and by 1937, Turkey become officially a secular state. At that time the old St. Sophia Christian church turned the Blue Mosque was transformed into a museum. 

Sophia is a character associated with the Gnostic Christian mysteries, a symbol of enlightenment highly respected by all the great minds of the ancient world. The church, however, has always labeled the Gnostics heretics, their teachings were and are still considered heresies, and yet via an association with the Essenes' teachings, plus the education Jesus had received in the Far East, Persia, and Egypt, Jesus, Paul, and Mary Magdalene too were of a Gnostic persuasion, nothing to do with church Christianity. This is how we know that the Gnostics and the Cathari, not the Christian church, were the ones preserving Jesus, Paul, and Mary's legacy. 

Within the Gnostic community Sophia was a revered symbol for divine wisdom. Equally significant, at a time when the Christian Trinity included a feminine entity, she was the second attribute of the Holy Trinity. Last but certainly not the least Sophia was the other name given to Christ by certain 4th century theologians. 

According to these theologians, Sophia and Christ were one and the same, a feminine-masculine spiritual emanation from the source some erroneously call God. This would have been very much like and most likely inspired by the ancient Chinese concept of Yin and Yang describing separate yet complementary masculine and feminine, positive and negative energies. The Gnostic point of view was this feminine-masculine Sophia-Christ entity was associated with the notion of shared knowledge and wisdom by divine beings, by people from the sky, as well as by the source itself. According to them too, Earth people were constantly receiving knowledge from the source, from IT. In his authentic letters Paul makes references to this fact and more than once (this is still part of A Time of Change and you will find it explained there in detail), with something similar being stated in the Quran. 

As a result, as a mythical character the Sophia/Christ entity was related to the bringers of light and to the members of the genuine Brotherhood of the Serpent, a group of non-terrestrial beings that contrary to the agenda adopted by the Custodial authorities that gave us the institutions of religion and slavery were here helping Earth-humans build their own advanced civilization. The Custodial authorities where trying to prevent that from happening so they could continue to use the population of the planet as slaves. This is why the Bible condones and endorses slavery from the first book of the Old Testament to the last of the forged texts, the ones attached at the end of the New Testament. 

To confuse the masses about the positive role this entity was playing in their life according to Gnostic traditions, in the Adam and Eve story of the Bible and the Torah, not  in its Quran version, which by and large is a different Adam and Eve story, one rich in enlightening esoteric knowledge, that too analyzed in the book, Sophia/Christ becomes now the character called Eve. Precisely because same as Jesus, Sophia, now Eve, was on a mission to awaken the Earth-human consciousness' from the sleep the Custodial authorities put it to, Jewish scribes and later church people would malign her. A consequence of that, for two thousand years now, even though in reality Eve was a symbol for spiritual awakening, based on the fabricated story in the Torah and the Bible, women all over the planet have been considered evil and were treated as second class citizens. 

She supposedly commits a grave sin when together with the serpent, a symbol of the Brotherhood of the Serpent, among others, and of transfer of information from the source of everything to Earth people, encourages Adam, as in humankind, to disobey Genesis God’s orders and feed on the fruits of the tree of knowledge. From now own the masses were to perceive Eve/Sophia, women in general and a serpent representing the ones generously sharing a special knowledge with Earth-humans as wrongdoers that dared to defy a God that wanted man to remain poor in spirit. This God of love, as described in churches, supposedly punishes humans with a debilitating eternal curse, which was a story created by priests seeking to make people obey them considering they claimed to be the intercessors of that vengeful God. In essence, in order to make Earth-humans stay away from knowledge so they could be easily manipulated and controlled, according to both the Torah and the Bible this God conveniently punishes not just Adam and Eve but the entire humankind. 

Based on what was revealed through the mysteries, which contained coded information only the initiated had accessed to, mysteries often referenced by a Jesus and by a Paul who in reality were teaching against religion, every time it incarnates a new human body the soul’s mission is to ascend to a higher level of enlightenment so it could become reunited with its source. The soul reaches that state by seeking the company of “Sophia,” of wisdom. Helped by benevolent non-terrestrial non-supernatural entities to fulfill its mission, wisdom is something the Earth-human’s spirit must find though on its own, by processing gnosis, knowledge it also uncovers while experiencing the earth plane. 

Once the so-called Universal Church took over the reins of power in a now disintegrating Roman Empire, the bishops would denigrate in the eyes of the masses the authentic non-religious Christian movement and almost completely silenced the voice of the Gnostic Christians by burning their books and their savants. Suddenly, Sophia, who same as Christ was a symbol for spiritual enlightenment was to be viewed now as something evil the Christian God had cursed, the Eve that tricked poor Adam into committing the greatest sin ever, the sin of seeking knowledge. As attested in no other than the Bible, though, seeking the liberating knowledge happens to be precisely what Jesus is urging his followers to do, with that being only one of the many instances when Jesus and the institution of religion are in opposition. 

The effect that absurd rule imposed in houses of worship had on the people's psyche was that their natural inclination toward seeking the hidden truth and conquering the vast unknown was diminished, when not completely disrupted.That deliberately induced mentality was what threw humankind into a prolonged Dark Age. Many among the planet's population would not even be aware of that, with the Dark Age being something they only now begin to truly extract themselves mentally from, but they have been living according to a false perception of reality for most of their entire life.

(Edited August 31, 2023)

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public in this format free of charge. You could only share it free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 

ATmeOfChangePG@gmail.com 

THE GODS OF CIVILIZATION EARTH

"If you hold to my teachings, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."

                                                                         - John 8:31-32

The Bible is actually void of most of Jesus' authentic teachings. Jesus mentions "my teachings," but in its current heavily edited condition the Bible, The New Testament in this instance, reveals very little of the truth he is referring to when addressing his followers. In the verses following John 8:31-32, he explains what he meant by that, but the explanation is now extremely confusing. In fact, it looks like something inserted there by church scribes or like text edited for content to divert attention from Jesus' anti-religion message. For, as you are going to see in A Time of Change, Jesus was teaching against religion, against living one's life according to belief, and he had a very low opinion of the sacerdotal class. Not just in Judea but also in India and Persia, he introduces his audiences to liberating truth that was going to set them free from the false perception of reality created through religion, knowledge he had been initiated into during his formative years, the eighteen years of his life between the age of 12 and 30 the Bible says nothing about. According to sources to be revealed in the last volume of the book, Jesus received a significant part of his education in centers established by the people of the sky in many parts of India, Tibet, Persia, and Egypt.

When we pay attention to what the text says it is obvious his "Father" was not the all-knowing God of religion, otherwise a composite fictional character religious institutions were and are still using to confuse the people about certain aspects of their history. Similar to what we will later have in the case of Muhammad, his teachings included knowledge that was "out of this world," as in of a non-terrestrial origin. 

According to the Sanskrit text Mahabharata, there are over 400,000 civilizations in this universe alone, and every one of them exists at its level of development. Some of them are millions of years ahead of ours, and according to sources to be revealed in the book, civilization Earth is an experiment. Among others, this is why we have this divdersity of human races on the planet. The Bible does not reveal their origin, and they could not be a product of adaptation to changes in weather pattern either, as claimed by evolutionists. We also speak over 7,000 languages, the origin of which no scientist can explain, certainly not by the way of gradual evolution and natural selection. A certain text in the Bible, on the other hand, tells us something very interesting, and ungodly, about this matter, a shocking revelation for many church-goers and non-religious humans alike. 

At one point, the experiment was hijacked by unkind non-terrestrial entities that sought to take control over the resources of the planet and to use Earth people as slave labor. These were the same entities that gave us religion and the institution of slavery. They would later create political forms of government, with some of them pretending to be giving people fair representation in the governing of their countries when in reality they were dividing them. They also came up with the monetary system, an instrument of artificial class stratification, and together with the institution of religion these existential and economic concepts formed an inescapable mental and physical control device that to this day keeps Earth people trapped in a false perception of reality. This existential system makes rich people richer all the time while the poor stays poor most of the time and this is no accident. 

According to the dame sources to be revealed in the book, no one else in the universe uses religion. As fringe as this might sound to some, at one time Earth people were genetically downgraded by "God," as a matter of fact by group of gods, and as you are going to see we have scientific evidence of that. Among others, they were to live shorter lives, up to 120 years, and they were genetically set to operate at the frequency of belief. This is why Earth people are prone to believing things claimed on TV,  in the newspapers, by politicians and religious leaders or the so-called academia experts without applying critical thinking or fact-checking them. Taking advantage of their new condition, those entities from the sky would constantly feed them false information through their religious institutions, at the same time forbidding them access to knowledge, as stated in the Genesis by someone described there as God. The intent behind the downgrading and behind describing knowledge as the forbidden fruit was to make it very easy for them to control and manipulate Earth-humans, and that has been the case for thousands of years.

To keep them in the dark about their true origin and potential, later on, through pseudo-science labeled fact, such as a theory of evolution claiming that species turned into other species as they were adapting to changes in the environment, something evolutionists had zero evidence for, they would re-trap the ones escaping the religious belief into a new illusion, the one about life forms miraculously emerging out of nonbiological matter and somehow transitioning into every single living organism we have today on this planet, with none of that making any sense or being possible according to genuine science. 

Scientific materialism, empiricism, evolutionary theory, all these are flawed concepts associated with a new form of belief, a new religion that generates a different kind of false perception of reality. The purpose behind indoctrinating the young generation in schools and universities with this new belief is the same purpose behind the creation of the institution of classic religion: to maintain a status quo that benefits the current custodians of the planet. This is why, as you are going to see in the book, despite the appearance of these being opposing sides, church creationists and materialist scientists, evolutionists included, have similar, when not identical erroneous views on most major issues of great significance for the global community.  

So who are the "us" and the "we" gods of the Bible, Torah and the Quran? Weren't houses of worship supposed to venerate a one and only God? The claim by Christian apologists that the "we" and the "us" in the Bible, which occurs mostly in the Old Testament, is a reference to the "holy trinity" is contradicted by the very text of the Bible: "God presides in the great assembly; he renders judgment among the gods." (Psalm 82) Neither Jews, with most text of the Old Testament belonging to the Jewish traditions, nor Muslims would adopt the concept of trinity, and yet their holy books too include references to a group of individuals that seem to be in charge of civilization Earth. 

As you are going to see in the book, the term "God" refers to a very knowledgeable human. There are many gods in the universe, individuals extremely proficient in physics, genetics, astronomy, mathematics and to knowledge pertaining to the spiritual or the metaphysical. The appellation GOD is something similar to the Ph.D. acronym on this planet, Philosophiae Doctor, attached to the name of certain members of the academia who have earned this distinction. 

This completely changes the way we perceive not just religion but also the very history of our civilization. Among others, we can understand now why the gods of Genesis 3:22, whoever those individuals might have been, were not pleased that the Earth-human became "like one of us, knowing good and evil," an Earth-human that to have control over they genetically downgraded him, this way minimizing his analytical skills, and forbade him to feed on the fruits of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. This was why the people of the planet were later told, "the truth will set you free." Jesus' anti-religion teachings were meant to help them escape the mental trap of belief, know the liberating truth, and this way become the gods they were capable destined to be: "Jesus answered them, "It is not written in your Law, 'I have said you are Gods'" (John 10:34) 

(Edited January 2, 2024)

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 

ON THE NATURE OF BEING A HUMAN: EVERYTHING IS ENERGY AND INFORMATION

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."                                                                                       - Albert Einstein

Life is a very, very interesting experience to have when one pays attention to what he or she experiences. We are always made aware of where we are, of where we are heading to, and of where we are supposed to go. We are basically reminded all the time of what we are here to accomplish. Who or what does that is a question that requires a complex answer. As you are going to see in A Time of Change, though, that is not impossible to explain.

This may sound crazy and even scary to some, but theoretical physicists have found evidence suggesting we are participants in an amazing virtual reality game, the product of a super-sophisticated computer program put together by something we could define as super-consciousness. As a result, while in terms of the choices we can make the possibilities are limitless, same as what we have in a video game, everything is digitally designed to occur in a certain way. In other words, this is not that crazy, after all, and as by now many of us know, in this universe there is always a rational logical reaction to every one of our actions. 

The law of cause and effect is one of the main rules of the game when it comes to experiencing material reality. A proven fact, if you take the same action over and over again within the same circumstances, one reaches the same conclusion every each time. Even though we are the ones choosing what we experience, how the universe responds to our choices is not in our hands. It happens though in a form that is most beneficial for our mission in life.

The universe is tuned to the frequency of honesty and truth. Mathematics, physics, geometry are devices meant to help us make truthful representations of what we perceive as reality. This is why to some extent what we perceive as future is mathematically predictable and knowable, especially since what might happen in the future, that choice of here-and-now is already there and it will be there for eternity.

Knowledge is what gives us the ability to make the most appropriate choice of now and here event when it comes to the purpose of our being here. That choice corresponds to existing circumstances and to the grand order of things. Universal law does not punish, nor does it reward us for making "good" or "bad" choices. 

In houses of worship they made humans believe universal law is one and the same with the will of some kind of God that supposedly has life and death powers over them. Far from that, nothing comes though out of nothing, and common sense says there must be a source for all the energy and information that makes the universe, life forms included, and for the laws of physics that govern our universe.

Te law of cause and effect does not rule the world of the spiritual, of the metaphysical. The spiritual is a dimension that generates the information carrying energies that become manifest as material forms, humans included, and the so-called laws of physics. The energies of the spiritual act on the energies of the material the same way software makes images and sound appear on the screen of our computers. The information carrying energy that makes images and sound appear on the screen of our computers is unseeable but its effects are quite obvious, and the same goes for the energies of the spiritual that affect us all the time and generate the illusion, according to quantum physicists, perceived as material reality. Because everything was programmed in another dimension, theoretically the effect is predictable, and so is every activity we observe in the universe. We did not just imagine these digital devices with work with today. We figured out a small part of how the universe operates, and then we replicated that according to our current level of understanding of reality.

Humans are spirit energy within a physical body, software downloaded into the biological hard drive at the moment of birth. The difference is that the spirit energy is repeatedly incarnating the hard drive of different human bodies for the purpose of its advancement, of achieving enlightenment, of purifying its energy. Enlightenment translates into a higher vibrational frequency, and when the level of vibration is way above the vibrational frequency of the material world, the return to the earth plane is no longer necessary.

Nothing of what we experience is coincidental or without purpose. Reincarnation facilitates the continuation of the process of awakening. The purpose of what we experience is always attuned to the purpose of our being here. Last but not the least the purpose of our being here corresponds to the grand purpose behind the existence of the universe and all human life that inhabits its infinite dimension.

(Edited August 31, 2023)

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3