Monday, January 1, 2024

A TIME OF CHANGE - A BOOK FOR CIVILIZATION ADVANCEMENT


“The Ultimate Tyranny in a society is not control by martial law. It is control by the psychological manipulation of consciousness, through which reality is defined so that those who exist within it do not even realize that they are in prison. They do not even realize that there is something outside of where they exist.”
                                       - Bringers of the Dawn, Outside the Ultimate Tyranny

This quote was a foretelling summary of what A Time of Change would end up bringing to the attention of Earth people. Published years before work on it started, one of the many synchronic events experienced during the long journey to its completion, I would only become familiar with Marciniak's channeling of information transmitted telepathically by the Collective of Light and made public as Bringers of the Dawn when my own book project was close to its initial final form. Right before work at what was now a three-volume look at how civilization Earth became what it is today and why came to its actual end, which was fourteen years later, I realized the message from our relatives in those cosmic high places was a lot ampler, so I caught significant parts of it in the last volume of the book. The new generation of Earth people must finally know where we came from and why this planetary world has been in a constant state of crisis for thousands of years.  
        
The original intent behind the impulse of taking on what in the end became a multi-layered book project was to show that there was no official valid explanation for the origin of civilization Earth, of life in general, or for the purpose of our being here, and nothing in that respect has changed during the almost two decades that took it to put it together. The project, however, would evolve way beyond that.

While analyzing facts unveiled during the research process, it became difficult to believe no one within the academia or any of our science journalists could not see that Darwinian spontaneous biological and genetic gradualism was not possible in nature, that what everyone called intelligent design was not religion, they went to court to put an official ban on discussing intelligent design in schools based on that false assessment, that the muddled argument made in On the Origin of Species was completely nonsensical, or that no one within our government and the media was aware the Bible, the religious book most American elected-presidents took the oath of office with their hand on instigates to the committing of all sorts of crimes, genocide, homicide, and rape included, that it condones and endorses slavery, sexism, homophobia, all that coming in conflict with common law. In addition to that, as indisputable evidence proves, much to the disbelief of those raised to be believers, the one hailed as the founder of the Christian religion, someone most everyone calls Jesus even though this is not his real name was teaching against religion, and that he started on this path since the time he was in India, during his formative years, eighteen years of his life the Bible says nothing about. This is one of the most serious breaches of trust the population of the planet has been treated to by those who had created the institution of religion as an instrument of control and manipulation. That and the fact that the Catholic Church we have today is the result of one of the boldest frauds committed in the history of civilization Earth, something its leadership has otherwise officially admitted to it a long time ago.

For an unbiased observer it was obvious the population of the planet was tricked into living according to a false perception of reality, at the same time being prevented from accessing the liberating truth. Every time someone exposed this global state of affair, he or she would be labeled conspiracy theorist, the intent being to make the public believe that, by definition, all conspiracy theories are false. Considering that, as I was soon to find out the publishing industry was not in the business of printing books that had the potential of causing the status quo to come undone, it looked like the project was heading straight to the underground. That, however, is place of darkness while its purpose was to shine light into the darkness of our above the ground world. 

By and large the content of the book is the cumulative result of the, in many instances, shocking discoveries made once what turned out to be an unusual case of investigative journalism started in earnest approximately a year and a half after the first lines were saved in a file that at the time was titled The Day Belief Becomes History. As the dots were beginning now to connect basically by themselves, and they did so until the last moments of the editing process, the result was a game of puzzle revealing a sobering image of the world we live in. That world was in dire need of change, you could sense the new frequency already engulfing the entire planet, and this was how the new title, A Time of Change, came to mind. The evidence was there for all to see, and it became clear that while for some it would represent a serious threat to their interests and that there was a strong possibility they will react in desperate anger, what mattered most was that the book was opening windows and doors to illuminating knowledge hidden in plain view by the controlling entities behind the current state of our world. 
"Know that we do not have many of the answers you were told we have and that many of the answers provided in schools, universities, and in houses of worship are deliberate distortions of a reality kept hidden from the Earth-human for thousands of years now. Know that we have answers you have not been told we have. Seek the liberating truth."
                                             - A Time of Change, Volume 2
There are layers of truth out there yet to be uncovered, and layers of deception to be torn down. Those layers of deception were meant to prevent Earth people from accessing the liberating truth. A consequence of that, humankind fell into a prolonged age of darkness, the current status quo. 

Things are about to change. It is written in the stars to happen at this crossroad in the history of the planet. The people are beginning to awaken to the reality of the fact that they have been mentally enslaved to an illusion of reality produced by those who at one point took over Earth by force from the bringers of light. Once they were mentally trapped into that illusion by the way of indoctrination with all kinds of beliefs, they were also kept in a constant state of fear. That made it easy for the new owners to use them as slave labor, something accomplished by the way of the current existential system. An extension of the slave system, this existential system would benefit the very few to the detriment of the many forced into working for them. This is where we are today as a civilization. 

A Time of Change - On The True Origin Of Life, Universe, And Civilization Earth addresses a multitude of interrelated topics regarding our origin, the nature of reality, the nature of being human, and the purpose of experiencing the earth plane. With work on the book starting March of 2006, since 2013, the year when it was completed in its initial form, there have been close to thirty drafts, as in thirty complete better versions. 2024 is the year when civilization Earth will move into the next phase of its programmed advancement. There will be major developments at a global level, things are already happening due to an influx of new and powerful beneficial astral energies, our own frequency is changing, all this helping us improve the way we see ourselves and what goes on around and within us. Humankind will experience a collective awakening, with this process starting, in fact, a long time ago. 2024 is also going to be the year when A Time of Change will be released in its most elaborate form ever. 

"The beauty of bringing down restrictive walls and shredding to pieces the veils of deception resides not just in the act of liberation itself but in experiencing the awareness of what lies behind them."
                                             - A Time of Change, Volume 3

It is the author's already expressed intent to make it available on the Internet free of charge. For the first time in millennia Earth-humans will be able to see things for what they are and not as what they were made to believe they are. They should not have to pay for having access to something that belongs to them. In response to that I was told that according to the mentality generated by a system where everything is about buying and selling things for a profit and success is defined by the size of one's accumulation of ephemeral material riches, something free is seen as something of no value. The original intent stands, especially since 2024 is going to be the beginning of the birth of a New Earth. Humankind is about to figure out its collective purpose, and the world will never be the same.

***

To find out more about the book scroll down or pick a date in the Blog Archive on the right. Suggested readings: A Book's Journey - An Autobiographical Insight into the Origin of the Project, Les Misérables and A Time of Change, and A Time of Change - Topics and Targets.


The author is not associated with any political organization, religious cult, secret society, spiritualist, or new age movement, nor does he intend to create something of that nature. What the people of the planet choose to do with the information provided in the book is entirely up to them.

atimeofchangePG@gmail.com

Sunday, December 31, 2023

A BOOK'S JOURNEY - AN AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL INSIGHT INTO THE ORIGIN OF THE PROJECT

At a time when the distribution of information in America is under a much stricter control than it has ever been, and when the meaning of what the people are allowed to know is deliberately misrepresented by on-call experts serving the agenda of those who control the distribution of information, some may see A Time of Change as an underground book. It was not intended as such, and in the era of e-communication and e-files there is no longer such thing as a safe underground for the noncompliant. That said, the more they want certain truth hidden from the masses, the same Internet makes it more difficult for them to silence the truth speaking ordinary people. On the other hand, the academia leadership plays for the same owners and tries to make sure the status quo remains unchanged. This book is an all out sharing of verifiable facts, no innuendos or hidden agendas here, targeting the entire global community. Despite how some may choose to react because of how the evidence affects their current social status, no matter their political, religious, or artisanal ideological affiliations, this book will forever take the Earth-human out of the illusion of reality created by the way of perception manipulation, something civilization Earth was forced to exist under for thousands of years. 

THE AUTHOR'S JOURNEY.

When I look back at my life so far, I have no doubts the premises for the writing of the book have been set before I opened eyes into this world. Based on memories accumulated along the time to be revealed under different circumstances, it looks very much like my life's course was programmed for this destination. 

There has been an indisputable pattern in terms of the people I came in contact with, including the family I was born into and the family I created through marriage. Everything left me with no other choice but keep the out-there at a distance so I could observe it as objectively as possible from my protective inner domain. This way I would remain untouched by the absurd, the deception, and the irrational I was often surrounded by. One could say I did not have a normal life, and yet a normal life would be unsuitable for anyone's mission in life. I had a very interesting life, to say the least, for which I am grateful to the universe and to my guides. More than that, I do not expect or wish that to change in the years ahead.  

We choose our parents and this way our entire circle of family and friends before we are born, a choice that serves the purpose of our coming into this world. My family forced me to live within myself and to some extent free of restrictions, by the way of maternal and paternal disinterest, which allowed me to focus on everything I was experiencing from a very personal perspective and without any interference. Nobody told me how things are. I had to figure that all by myself, and it helped. For, unbeknownst to them, they would put me in situations that turned out to be great lessons I needed to learn so I could become aware of a certain reality. It did not matter if I liked it or not, I was alway where I needed to be, and that is also the case for where I am right now.

I would take advantage of their disinterest in me, and I would wander the world on my own, meeting people that would mold my personality in a way that made me trust my own judgement and my intuition. I would wander freely the forests, the valleys, and the mountains surrounding a small village in the old country where my father ran every summer an acting school. At an early age I would get my first very close unobstructed by prejudice or pettiness look at the magnificent beauty and astonishing complexity of nature. Mother Nature taught me to live in the moment without expectations while the people of that forgotten world helped me uncover the inestimable value of honesty, common sense, and kindness. This was my Shangri-La, except that everything was as real as real can be.

Observing nature triggered within my mind questions about the origin of everything. Where did the trees, the flowers, the rivers and the rocks, the stars in the sky, the birds, and the wonder of all wonders, the human being come from? We take for granted this amazing planet planted somewhere within an infinite universe, in the middle of an hostile to life space, and yet our destiny is associated with its existence.  

The house where my family rented a small room was situated between two churches, and even though my parents were not religious, I would go there alone, especially when the church was empty being that I was pretty shy. I was overwhelmed by the huge images of saints and of the Bible stories painted on the walls. As I grew up some, I was bold enough to show up in church during Sunday service. Wanted to find out how things worked in the house of God. From an early age I became aware of what they were telling people there, and I imagined everything must have been true. 

I made an effort to understand what religion was all about, and while the hymn singing, the acoustics, the lit candles, the incense burning, the paintings on the walls and the priest's gilded outfit were making an impression on you, the meaning of the preached words left me wondering. They were saying that a God who looked like us created the world and man, and that everything happening to us was his will. Did they also mean all the wars, the diseases, and the cataclysms, all the social issues with our communities? Their claim did not exactly answer my very specific questions about the origin of the universe and everything in it. Then, later in life, I would figure out that the saintly figures and the stories painted on church walls were of the imaginary. In other words, everything in my church was made-up, with some of those fantasies being a deliberate distortion of a reality I would only become familiar much later in life.

Darwin's theory did not make a lot of sense to me either, and our secular atheist government in Eastern Europe apparently felt the same way. That would explain why I don't remember Darwin's name being mentioned much in biology class. This was not because the education system was not on the par with the one in the West. As a matter of fact, at the time I was in grammar school the regime was investing massively in education, reason why in those days we had great schools and mostly great teachers. It also invested in culture and art, and I knew that because I happened to grow up in the wings of the theater company where my father was an actor, a theater company that at one time was considered the best theater company in the world. The fact is, I could not believe someone would believe rabbits turned into leopards or that fishes grew overnight lungs to become land animals, and while I had heard about it, at the time I did not know much about the DNA. As it turned out, this is one of the major problems with the claims made in the theory of evolution.  

During the high school years, I focused my attention to the sky, to the universe. I did not see God or angels there. Instead, from that came the realization that we were living on a speck of dust within an apparently infinite cosmic world, and the inevitable question was the same question I had been asking myself and others for quite sometime now: Why are we here, and what was out there? Not only that but what was the purpose of us living and dying on a planet like Earth? Fascinated by the awesome cosmic display of distant lights and by the beauty of the natural wonders our planetary world was appointed with, I could not understand the division and the hatefulness characterizing our communities, the oppressive behavior by those who ruled over us, the constant religious wars or triggered by territorial disputes that made our existence a nightmare, nor could I explain the division existing between us. All those questions remained deeply engraved into my memory, and much to my astonishment, decades later, once work on the book started I would find the answers to almost all of them.

TROUBLED TIMES. 

By the time I was now in my late teens, the old country was under the rule of one of the most dictatorial Eastern European regimes. By the time I graduated from college, society was in full downfall both economically and morally. What made life unbearable was the fact that almost all rational existential rules had been officially abolished while lack of basic sustenance was pushing the population to the brink of uncontrollable desperation. Living on principle and organically unable to comply with the terms and demands of those irrational circumstances, I decided to abandon the acting career I had dreamed about and I prepared for all my life. It did not come easy to make that choice, and yet it was the right thing to do. My plan was to leave behind the city I grew up in and retreat, at what was still a very young age a few years out of college, to a small, quiet village in the mountains, with the people over there belonging to a still idilic world, to another dimension. 

Since nature had always been my best friend and an endeared refuge from the hostilities of an out of balance world, I loved the idea very much. At the same time something within was telling me this was not where I was supposed to go, that this was not my real destination. That place I was choosing would have been too comfortable and because of that unproductive when it came to my mission in life, a mission I knew nothing about at the time. I was, however, instinctively searching for something, something I would have only known what it was once I found it.

Creative writing allows one to express himself without anyone interfering, at least not during the process of creation. Writing about the life of the mountain people and about the natural wonders they were surrounded by, about Mother Earth would have reduced considerably the censorship challenges. There were though two  immediate existential issues I had to deal with. First, the situation in the country was getting worse by the day, with the most educated among the people, the ones who read books, immigrating by the thousands, by the hundreds of thousands every year. Then there was the fact that, just out of college, it was not easy to find the money I needed to build my dream home. So, I decided to go for a while where the money supposedly was: America!   

In a letter to the government's passport department, I let the regime know I intended to return within a few years. Writing that kind of a letter to the government expressing my otherwise sincere desire to return there when living in that country felt at times like living in a prison was very unusual. Nevertheless, it had a good effect on what I was trying to achieve. Thousands of people would be waiting five to six years to get an exit visa, you needed to have one even if you were traveling outside the country for three days. I received mine in about eighteen months, with the American consulate too, being extremely accommodating in those days. After all, they were getting at no cost a significant number of college-educated laborers, doctors and engineers included, something the government of my country had paid for since same as health care education was free. 

Turning your back to a terrible situation does not eliminate the cause of the problem or the problem. Not only that but the assumption that things are perfect on the other side of the fence turned out to be an illusion. There are no guarantees you will succeed, no rule set in stone you will become rich. Then there is the fact that everyone brings with him or her specific circumstances that may or may not be helpful when it comes to integrating in the new world. 

I only spent a couple of years in America, a lot less than I initially intended to. During that time I ran into ex-pats who while in the beginning they were elated to escape the nightmare at home had been struggling for years, with no relief visible on the horizon. They were worse off than they were back in in the old country, and were visibly suffering. Eternally homesick and never adapted to the new world, you could sense how their only way to cope with the situation was by pretending things were better than they actually were. Other times, they would get extremely angry as they were sensing their hopelessness. The morning after those moments of induced illusion or crisis they would wake up with deep psychological scars that for some would never heal. 

Extremely homesick myself, desperately missing the mountains, the Danube Delta, and the people of those places, I decided to return without accomplishing what I had come here to accomplish. I always had an instinctual cold relation with money, something even living in America was not going to change. Before I left for what I still called home at the time, I was able to finish though my first novel, a three-volume saga about a lost generation, my generation. Even back then I would only write about things I knew. It was a fictional story based on very real facts. I was pleased with the outcome, but not sure they will publish something like that back home considering that the dictatorial regime was still in power. The world was changing, though, and I wanted to be part of that change. So, back to a home that was still a prison I went. 

On my way home I spent a month and a half in Paris, my only real vacation in my entire life as an adult. It was a wonderful experience that consisted in falling love a beautiful, intelligent being while inhaling deep into my being all the culture Paris and surroundings had to offer. That wonderful experience, however, made the reconnecting with the old country even more of a shock. 

As difficult to imagine as it was, I found it in an even worse shape than it was when I left. As expected, a representative of the government showed up at my door unannounced to ask me, very politely, to write an article critical of America. It was to be published in one of the state-owned magazines. Not that everything I saw and experienced in America made a great impression on me - at that time New York's 42nd Street was a replica of what hell may look like if there was a hell, but I refused to do it. In fact, I did write an article that was not what they were expected, my explanation being, there is always something good to take from our life lessons, so why focus on the negative. A consequence of that, I was blacklisted. I was not allowed to work as an actor in the capital of the country, the national center of cultural activities, and for the next four years the manuscript of the novel I brought with me from Brooklyn, New York remained locked inside a cabinet file a the state-owned publishing house. 

All so-called Communist regimes in Eastern Europe had been replaced by now or were in course of being replaced with western-type democracies. Not the one in my country, though, but you could sense the volcano was about to erupt. By the end of 1989, the leader of the regime was ousted, basically assassinated during what at the time most everyone thought it was a popular revolt. As I would soon find out, it was a coup d'état organized by members of the old regime, with support from Moscow and Washington. Unlike in the case of all the other Eastern European countries where the regime change was brought about through what the media described as a "velvet revolution," the one in Romania was bloody, one could say ugly, and nobody on the outside could tell what entities were exactly involved or who was shooting at the people and why. 

A journalist now with a newspaper that had national distribution, I was a close observer of many dramatic events. I would meet with and interview people one way or the other associated with what was going on, and I soon realized the country was the victim of a staged power take over. I personally knew some of the actors of the staged revolution, with most people in the streets being used as pawns, unpaid extras in a scripted show meant to give legitimacy to the new leaders. What I found out in that regard was unprintable under those new "democratic" circumstances. We were considered opposition by the interim governing bodies, and because of that we were now under constant threat. 

Old regime people and coup organizers won the proclaimed democratic elections, and I would witness crass irregularities committed at the voting stations. Once the power grab was complete, there was violence in the streets directed at those protesting the new regime, at the political parties in opposition, and at the critics of the new regime among the press. My newspaper was one of the targets and our headquarters were ransacked by government mobs. A night of the long knives was to follow, friends in the western media warned me, and that brought me back to America. The year was 1990.

AMERICA! AMERICA! 

The end of October 1990, I left my old country, again, this time for good. To make it easier for us to settle, I had to leave my wife and two children behind. Considering what was going on the country and my circumstances, I was extremely confident I would be granted asylum within weeks and that I was going to have them in America before Christmas. In those couple of months I was going to make arrangements, I had things already lined up, so they would have a decent place to stay when they arrived. This time around, unlike before when everyone coming out of my country would be automatically granted asylum based solely on that, I had a very strong personal case for political asylum. Things would take though an unexpected turn, with that completely changing my life. 

As the first Gulf War (August 2, 1990 - February 28, 1991) was about to erupt after Iraq had invaded Kuwait, with the war itself starting beginning of February 1991 and lasting for a whole two weeks, the United States military needed my country's refining capacities to make gas for its fighter jets. The problem with that was, as long as its government was listed as a dictatorship in the State Department's yearly country report and a violator of human rights, a few months before I left President George H. Bush described publicly the situation in my country as "a return to dictatorship," according to American law, the US could not have cut that kind of a deal with that kind of a government. To be able to get what America needed, the State Department changed the country report and did that basically as I was flying to NewYork. i had no knowledge of that, but based on this new reality falsifying report, the INS had no grounds for granting me political asylum. 

The law was on my side, and yet the asylum granting process was artificially delayed to its longest possible limits. A couple of American Presidents and several senators and congressmen that offered to help when asked could not change the course of events, and in all honesty one is not sure they really tried to do that. The American immigration law is a rational good law and also a very clear law. The State Department, however, tends to abide by immigration policy not by immigration law. As a result, I had to wait for nine (9) interminable years before I was able to see my children. 

That prolonged unexpected separation affected our family. Despite efforts to give them a normal family life, I had lost my children long before they arrived in America. This new development would in fact extend the isolation I was more or less forced to place myself within from the beginnings of this life in the earth plane. That degree of clear separation left me with no other choice but focus on the mission I came here to accomplish.

As the great inventor and unique human Nikola Tesla once urged people in pursuit of their high goals, "Be alone, this is when ideas are born." I have been forced into self-imposed isolation since childhood, with my personal life being always very personal. Something I was able to verify over and over again, isolation while in pursuit of liberating truth generates enlightenment. This was how ideas were born and, in the end, this was how the book came to be.

A DESTINED PROJECT.

There have been many extreme unusual developments in my life, with all of them marking me always in a positive way, even when they had the appearance of trauma. As I would eventually realize, everything was in sync with the other unusual happenings I had experienced from the time I could remember things. Some of those experiences could only be described as paranormal preparatory events. In retrospective, I can tell they were meant to guide me to the trailhead where the final phase of the journey in terms of this book project was to begin. In many instances, they would introduce me to knowledge I was to understand later. Once again, for a long while I did not know what to make of any of that, but once I started working at the book, everything made suddenly perfect sense.  

When at the end of October1990 I was in America, again, I made a pact with myself: In five years I would publish something I wrote in English. The immigration issue and related concerns took my focus away from that. However, at the end of an interview for a job in a northeastern town, I was talking to this wonderful couple, and out of nowhere the lady said to me with her eyes beaming an intense light, "You should write!" and her husband was looking me in total agreement with her. I did not exactly know what to make of that either. Yes, I did have plans to write, but she, they did not know about that. 

It certainly registered at the subconscious level and even though I did not get the job, they thought I was overqualified for the position, I left in high spirits. Went to my car, and I was sitting there without any interest in returning home. After a while, I decided to let my sixth sense take the wheel, and I exited the highway without knowing where the road I was on was going to take me. There are no such things as accidents or coincidences, and I ended up in the Berkshires, a place that reminded me of the one I actually was, something I had lost touch with under those stressful circumstances. 

The Berkshires are known as being the most culture saturated rural area in America. I would  go home and write enthusiastically an essay about the experience, "You should write," they told me, and as the creative emotions were flooding the page unrestricted, I mentioned having a vision about me writing one day a special kind book. It was October of 1995 now, five years almost to the day since my second arrival in America, and The Berkshires Eagle published the essay. Without intending it, I have kept my promise. The universe never fails to put us in the right place, at the right times, for a good reason.  

It took the same immigration judge who initially rejected my request for asylum only two minutes to grant it based on the same evidence I had introduced in his court years earlier when my request was rejected. After family finally joined me, and while to be able to support them I was working one of those jobs that offered a decent salary but no professional satisfaction, I would spend several years writing for newspapers serving my community in America, Canada, and Israel. During that time, I took on the usual topics of interest, social and political events, as well as on relatively new ones, such as ancient and modern history, art, religion, and science. Following my essay being published in The Berkshires Eagle, though, I would not write anything else in English for ten years. The decision was the result of being extremely disappointed with the fact that my other writings, the ones submitted with the IRS during the political asylum debacle where not taken into consideration by the authorities. From writing nothing in English for a long while I went to writing a three-volume book of almost two thousand pages, something that, in the end, I would appropriately title A Time of Change

Work on it began on an impulse a few days after, in a middle of a writing hiatus, I ran into a copy of a college newspaper. There was an article in it and the headline drew my attention. It was a reaction by a well-intended yet ill-informed student to a recent decision issued at the end of a December 2005 trial in Dover, Pennsylvania where a  judge issued an unconstitutional ban on discussing intelligent design in public schools on account of ID being religion. Even if it were, and ID is not religion, there would have no grounds for the ban since no where in the constitution stays written that one is not to discuss religion in schools founded with federal money. 

The young man was making all the right claims when it came to science being better at explaining natural things than religion was, reiterating, in fact, what teacher activists had told him in class and what he read on social media without processing the information. To the casual reader the logic behind his position appeared sound: Religion bad, science good. As far as I was concerned, though, and I knew about the matter a lot less than I know today, part of what he was stating was false, and the problem with making a logical argument based on partially false premises is that your logical argument too is now false. Indeed, the theory of evolution was no the real counter-argument to religious irrational. In fact, it was as much of a fallacy as the religious dogma was.  

I had nothing else to do at the time, so, February of 2006, I decided to write an article for that same college newspaper. The subject was to be the fact that neither religion, nor the theory of evolution offered a rational explanation for the origin of life or the origin of our civilization. I knew it was a very controversial proposition, but I also knew I had strong evidence on my side. What I did not know at the time was that the debate was staged. Being that this was a too obvious reality to assume scientists and secular scholars of religion did not know what I knew, it became clear to me that the debate was not about truth seeking and truth sharing, but about perception manipulation. New evidence for that was now piling up on top of the evidence I had before I started writing the article, the argument in favor of that conclusion was getting more and more elaborate, the article became an essay, and the essay was heading toward becoming a book. Simultaneously, however, something else became very clear to me. No one was going to publish it. The same entities that wanted the public to believe religious creationism and biological gradualism were the only choices when it came to explaining the origin of humans and telling the history of humankind on this planet were the ones controlling the distribution of information.

As the book project was heading now in a direction I did not envision when work on it started, I began to realize this was going to be a little more than just controversial. In fact, since I was not an expert in the fields discussed, whatever that stands for when today people have access on the Internet to a lot more information than students paying high tuition fees have in colleges and universities, literary agents and publishers could use that, plus the appellative 'conspiracy theorist,' to refuse getting involved with the project. The fact is, precisely because I am not an expert in the academic sense, I can see things for what they are and not according to a manufactured understanding of reality one was indoctrinate with during his or her formative years. As a result, I had only two choices: either abandon, or continue the path and let the facts take me wherever they may. I decided to take it one page at a time and eighteen years later, I would not regret making that decision. Almost two decades dedicated to this project means that, at one time my life became the project and the project was my life.

Work on the book project started beginning of March 2006. By 2007, I had a 400-page book, and for a brief moment I was very happy with that. This was far from being the final version, though, and while new evidence was generating new ideas, I would have the same false sense of mission completed many a time. In 2013, a project re-titled now A Time of Change was one very large one-volume book of about 1,000 pages. I rushed to release it as an e-book. A couple of weeks later I took it down to make a few changes, then I released it again. Then I took it down for good and continued work on it. At one point I decided to offer it for free on my blog, and I felt very good about that. I then created a YouTube channel where I made a few measured attempts at promoting it. That turned out to be an interesting experience, a great learning lesson.

The adversarial reaction was to be expected. What came as a surprise was the lack of civility, the uncalled-for virulence of some of the attacks, the hostility, young people - vocabulary often betrays age - using standard, unthoughtful slogans learned by heart as counter-argument to facts revealing the lack of credibility of the theory of evolution. The religious people were threatening me with their God's wrath. I was convinced people would want to know the facts, that they would want to know that they were being deceived. I am still convinced this is true. In fact, humankind has made significant progress with its process of awakening. Then I realize that some of those attacks were orchestrated, meant as a way of protecting the status quo. Some of them were, in fact, protecting a source of major income generating a comfortable, ego-leasing social status. 

Most ordinary commentator's opinion was tributary to political activism. Their reaction was extremely impulsive, consisting in regurgitating standard false claims never taking the time to analyze the facts laid down before their eyes or the validity of what they had been told was proven fact. I would come to the realization that this mentality was something deliberately inoculated into their psyche by entities with an agenda, which made A Time of Change even more relevant that I thought it was. Their agenda was always the same, protecting the status quo that benefited the 1 percent of the 1 percent of the most rich among the few rulers of civilization Earth. However, the status quo had to change. In fact, the status quo is about to change.  

MOTIVATIONS AND AFFILIATIONS 

A Time of Change is not a collection of opinions issued by experts. Nor is this a book of personal theories unsupported by fact. The reader will find in it facts one did not know existed even though they had been right before our eyes all the time. In others instances, one will become reacquainted with facts that had been misinterpreted by the protectors of the status quo. These facts are placed now within their appropriate context, with that leading to a different understanding of the reality of what we are and of why we are here than the one issued in houses of worship, in history books by mainstream historians, and in colleges and universities. In other words, this is a very large puzzle, the result of that being a realistic image of our civilization. In a game of puzzle there is no cheating. You must have all the pieces, and you have to put them in the right place or else you don't get the picture.

There are entities out there who for a long time have been opposed to making public significant parts of the liberating truth. That was because a significant change in the people's perception of reality would lead to at change of status quo. The process of awakening is though inevitable and it cannot be stopped. Two hundred years ago humankind was a lot wiser than it was four hundred years ago. Today we are wiser and we know more than we knew two hundred years ago. To be able to build something new and better we must leave behind the old frequencies of the old understanding of reality. Our time on this planet as a civilization, as well as the planet's time is limited. Unbeknownst to most people, our civilization is on the way to putting itself in a position that would allow us to move to other locations within this universe before we exhaust the planet's natural resources. Within the next two to three centuries we should experience quantum leap advancement, and there are signs this is precisely what will begin to happen very soon, a lot sooner than one may have expected.   

It will not just happen because for the next 2,100 years our planet and us as spiritual entities will be traveling through an astral conjuncture favoring unheard of progress and enlightenment. We will make it happen. 

First, we will have to change our understanding of what we are, the nature of reality, and of the purpose of life. This will protect us from ever again becoming victims of manipulation. And even though the attempt at restoring the balance of power on this planet may initially result in chaos, it will also generate never seen before enlightenment. With tremendous enlightenment comes tremendous technological advancement. Then we will simultaneously have to get used to the fact that we are all inhabitants of the same planet, and that living as one comes not just with shared benefits but also with shared rational responsibilities. Last but not the least we will have to acknowledge publicly the fact that our civilization is part of a larger cosmic community. It includes hundreds of thousands of worlds like ours inhabited by hundreds of thousands of other human races, with many of them being millions of years ahead of us with their development. The members of some of these advanced non-terrestrial civilizations are, in fact, our brothers and sisters.

If for the time being one does not understand certain things, he or she should not dismiss the facts. Keep an open mind, for we are all spiritual beings having an experience in the material. The universe is going to put everyone in the most appropriate situations according to one's personal level of growth, so that, in the end, everyone is going to figure out the liberating truth. 

As an old word of wisdom goes, "Do good, then throw it into the sea." Contributing to the greater good is the main purpose of our collective mission in life goes, and the greater good of humankind is precisely what A Time of Change is meant to serve.

* * * 

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public in this format free of charge. You could only share it free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 





Tuesday, August 15, 2023

LES MISÉRABLES and A TIME OF CHANGE.

A socialist and according to recently discovered correspondence a Freemason, Victor Hugo was a man of his time, which happened to be a revolutionary time. His work has greatly influenced the world he lived in, and one could make the argument that the Paris Commune of 1871 was in large part a consequence of the impact Les Misérables, the book he released in 1862, had on an already social-change-oriented French society.   

As the reader of A Time of Change is going to find out, the Freemasons, the Illuminati, the Rosicrucian and the progressive members of the Jewish Community, from the one known as Jesus all the way to Albert Einstein (see his 1949 essay Why Socialism?) have always advocated for social change that favor the multitudes and pointed at the evils of materialism and slavery, the basis for the capitalist system. It was the same type of social change Karl Marx, a contemporary of Victor Hugo and the de facto author of the 1848 Communist Manifesto (Engels only made a few contributions to it), felt it was not just necessary but also inevitable. 

The Manifesto happened to be another document that has significantly influenced the ones behind the Paris Commune and Victor Hugo himself. Marx was born in a non-religious Jewish family that converted to Christianity at a time when open anti-Semitism rooted in church dogma was making it very difficult, if not impossible for Jewish people to succeed professionally or to be accepted in certain circles, the academia included. As a result, it is no coincidence that, as history records show all these groups have been constantly vilified and heavily persecuted by religious institutions, especially by the Catholic Church and anyone in a position of power associated with the church. 

No coincidence because, as you are going to find out, capitalism was created by a Catholic Church that would became one of the major profiteers of a system that was and still is an extension of the institution of slavery. Because the Freemasons and the Catholic Church were on opposing sides when it came to social issues, with the church favoring a monarchial system of government while the Freemasons, the Rosicrucian, and the Illuminati, organizations with deep roots into an yet to be told true history of civilization Earth were advocating for the establishment of a republic that was to be a from-the-people and for-the-people form of government, something they would first attempt to implement in America, the official history of the world is a masked reflection of a subterranean conflict between two entities vying for control over the destiny of the Earth people. Masked because there is a constant cover-up of what goes on behind these institutions and behind our government, the non-pubic, yet, area where they vie for a position of control. 

In "Interview with Karl Marx, head of the L'Internationale," by R. Landor published in the New York World on July 18, 1871, only a couple of months after the Paris Commune, suspecting certain secret societies were behind "the last Insurrection," Landor asks Marx if such a thing was possible, that L'Internationale did not have full control over the events, and that many of the participants in the streets were not even aware of that. Familiar with the fact that the Catholic Church was accusing the Freemasons of organizing these large-scale upheavals that most of the time had an anti-religion and a specific anti-Catholic platform, even though he claimed full leadership by L'Internationale, Marx acknowledges that individual Freemasons were active members of his organization. In doing so he points of the fact that the church was trying to make that into something nefarious, as if the Freemasons were the evil incarnated: "Then it was a plot of the Freemasons, too, for their share in the work as individuals was by no means a slight one. I should not be surprised, indeed, to find the Pope setting down the whole insurrection to their account." The fact is, by and large the pope would have been right.

One of the defining elements of the agenda adopted by those who started the 1789 French Revolution, the 1848 Spring of Nations Revolution, the 1871 Paris Commune, and the 1917 Russian Revolution was anticlericalism. For the record, according to existing documents and traditions, this was the same position adopted by the one known as Jesus when he was already teaching in India during his formative years, the eighteen years of his life missing from the Bible, a position he did not abandon when he returned to Judea to start his mission there. As even some of the texts included in the New Testament of the Bible reveal, Jesus was known for despising and for being very critical of the priests. 

One other thing these social upheavals had in common was that, same as the Enlightenment movement, they were, indeed, organized by Freemasons. Regarding the French Revolution, a few founders of America, with Jefferson, Paine, and even Adams, who unlike Jefferson was not a fan of the revolt in France, or of Paine, were not just acknowledging the grave problems created by leaders of religious institutions with political and materialistic ambitions meddling in the governing of the European countries, but were also of the opinion that the priests had it coming. 

The other significant detail regarding these very turbulent times in the history of Europe and America is the fact that, proof they were their initiators, in large part the ideology, the motivation behind these revolutions, and that includes the American Revolution, had been laid out publicly by personalities associated with the Freemasons, the Rosicrucian, with the Illuminati, and by the pro-democracy activist Jewish intellectual. 

The existential system every progressive was critical of kept producing a substantial class of poor people forced to work for the rich people so they could make a living, a goal barely accomplished. This was the reason why in Les Misérables, Hugo chose to tell the story of the June 1832 revolt in Paris, a story the authors of the musical with the same title, it premiered in the city of lights in 1980, focused on. Something we should ponder over once in while, after all this is recorded in our history books, way before Marx, Engels, and Lenin, class struggle and class conflict has been a recurring and, in fact, defining aspect of the history of humankind on this planet.

Contact in a public forum with new ideas and awareness of new and more accurate ways of understanding what is already known to Earth people leads to a change of perception of reality. That, in turn, creates the awareness of the need to make changes in the way we exist on this planet, and of what exactly must be changed. The often desperate desire for change experienced by those push beyond a certain limit is bound to come in conflict with the determination shown by those who profit from the current system as they protect and preserve a status quo that benefits them and them only. That inevitably results in social and economic chaos that fuels street revolt. As the same history records show, though, by and large even when the motivation for change was a well-thought by enlightened entities ideal, by definition chaotic violent events tend to fail to reach their declared objectives. 

Street revolutions are not always as spontaneous as they appear to be. At the same time, to avoid major chaos, entities having a certain measure of control over civilization Earth either hinder progress or slow it down so that the wheels of the current system would not come off. The idea behind that is to prevent the global community from plunging into an unmanageable situation. One should not assume though there is unity of opinion at the deep state level regarding how progress should be achieved and what it should consist of. There are several levels of unseen unelected controlling self-appointed authorities.

We live in a time when major change is not only expected to occur but it must occur and will occur. Opposition to change or lack of interest in change is going to generate the same kind of unmanageable chaos that would logically result from an impulsive attempt at abolishing the current system overnight. 

In Les Misérables we find the best explanation for why A Time of Change came to be. In the Preface to the book, Hugo describes in impressive details what has motivated him to write his own book, and as one reads through that, it dawns on him that the human aspiration toward living in liberty, as equals to each other, man or woman, and as a planetary brotherhood is a reaction to the constrictions and the artificial challenges created by the current existential system, one the Earth people were not responsible for. Since the system has remained the same for thousands of years, so is what hinders today our efforts to fulfill those aspirations. What changes is the realization by more and more inhabitants of the planet not only what the message in the liberating truth is but of the fact that they have the individual and the collective power of living according to that truth.

In the end, the implication is that there is a constant burning willingness in the people's hearts and souls to brake loose from the chains of deceit, oppression, and inequality that keep them enslaved to the material, something as real and valid today as it was in 1862 when Hugo released his book. According to him,

"So long as there shall exist, by reason of law and custom, a social condemnation, which, in the face of civilization, artificially creates hells on earth, and complicates a destiny that is divine, with human fatality; so long as the three problems of the age - the degradation of man by poverty, the ruin of woman by starvation, and the dwarfing of childhood by physical and spiritual night - are not solved; so long as, in certain regions, social asphyxia shall be possible; in other words, and from a yet more extended point of view, so long as ignorance and misery remain on earth, books like this cannot be useless." - Hauteville House, 1862

That makes one entertain the thought that, A Time of Change too is not a useless book after all. 

In fact, In large part a consequence of those partially failed revolutions of the past, we are in a better place today as a civilization than we were in 1862. Many of the problems enumerated by Hugo, however, those artificial "hells," as he calls them, have not been yet resolved. The good news is, they are about to be resolved, once and forever.

(Originally published on June 6, 2021)


A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 


A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public in this format free of charge. You could only share it free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 






Friday, July 15, 2022

WE EXIST THE WAY WE UNDERSTAND REALITY. - An Excerpt From A Time of Change, Volume 2.


"The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so." 
                                                       - Mark Twain
"Church stands for gathering, and the original churches were not houses of worship. They were houses of learning where men and women would get together to share and discuss knowledge while searching for a correct understanding of what they knew. Because of that, even though the institution of religion must be eradicated, one should not burn down churches, synagogues, and mosques. They are to be once again used by the community as gathering places where people will return to worshiping knowledge and reason instead of imaginary gods.

Some consider religion, and rightfully so, a branch of the entertainment industry. Among others, both preachers and entertainers put on an act by pretending to be something they are not. They both use light, sound, costumes, makeup, both work with a script, and in many instances they both get paid big money for doing that. No doubts about it, what you see on stage during a church revival is an act, and while according to Matthew 10:8 Jesus tells his disciples “Freely you have received; freely give,” to watch the show put on by Joel Osteen, Benny Hinn, Franklin Graham, or Creflo Dollar, to name only a few among the most known Bible-toting stage actors, you must buy a ticket. Someone has even written a book called Performing the Word: Preaching as Theater. It glorifies the vaudevillian approach to ministering, an approach that justifies the demand by many among the population of the planet that churches and preachers pay taxes like all the other for-profit institutions and entertainers. (See “20 Richest Pastors in the World In 2019," YouTube, running time 16 minutes 26 seconds.) The reason why our government does not collect taxes from them is that our government needs them to help it control the masses.

Be it land, buildings, art, or libraries, everything own by churches 
was not earned and is the property of the people. In that respect it is for the congregation, and not for the religious hierarchy to choose the topics of conversation in churches, especially when the priest’s salary comes from money donated by the people that make the congregation. Unlike school and higher education teachers who receive an academic education in a specific field of human interest, at the seminary or at religious universities the priests are taught how to make believers believe the irrational belief they preach is absolute truth. In the parts of the world where houses of worship are still subsidized by the state, in many instances the sacerdotal class is openly at the service of the government and play the political game to its advantage and to the advantage of officials that pass laws allowing for money to be diverted from public funds to the bank accounts of religious institutions. 

In accord with the request by Jesus that “Freely you have received; freely give,” in the original non-religious Gnostic churches, knowledge was, indeed, shared freely with everyone. The free-knowledge concept was meant to foster civilization advancement and it is still valid today, it will always be, and yet most governments are asking young men and women, the future of civilization Earth to pay significant tuition fees to get an education that on occasion consists of false or outdated information, as is the case with the teaching of the theory of evolution in colleges and universities as fact. Receiving an education is something that benefits not just our young men and women but also civilization Earth, which is why education should be free. Churches that make millions of tax-free dollars and were allowed to set shop on every college and university campus in the country preach from a book implying that seeking knowledge is a sin and calls ignorance of our spiritual nature a blessing. Being present on colleges campuses all over America despite that, is another thing revealing that religious institutions have been always used by those at the controls of civilization Earth as an instrument of perception manipulation, something that makes the people of the planet live their lives in a way that benefits the status quo. For, much to one’s surprise, we live the way we perceive reality, and the manipulators, our governments included, are aware of that.

Schools and universities are to expose students to everything we know about the universe, natural law, about our true history, the nature of being human, and the purpose of life, as well as about our future projects and objectives as a civilization. Instead of pretending we have answers we do not actually have, schools must make the new generation aware of our current cognitive limits as a civilization. This way young men and women will look for the answers we do not have yet. There should be no need for politicians with an agenda to push for laws allowing for the use of critical thinking in schools, for questioning the academic authority of a few, or for challenging absurd assumptions presented to the student body as scientific fact. This is normal human behavior associated with social rules deriving from our natural rights and common sense. “Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty,” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter sent from Paris to Uriah Forrest on December 31, 1787. This is not exactly what we have going on these days in America and all over the world, and the question is how did we end up in this situation?

Some feel uncomfortable, even afraid when invited to enter uncharted territories and worlds beyond their comfortable belief. Positive change could not happen without us traveling beyond our current cognitive limits. Fear is a natural feeling, and one should never pretend it is not there if that happens. As someone once said, acknowledging fear is the beginning of conquering it. One must not allow his or her spirit to be dominated and controlled by fear, though, for fear is what makes people act and react the way someone wants them to act and react. This was why we were once told, “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” Fear inhibits our instinctual inclination toward acting in harmony with the law that governs the universe. Fear deprives us of our natural impulse to change a certain state of affair that is out of sync with the frequency of honesty and truth. Change that benefits the greater good could not happen without challenging the status quo, the current mentality, the current understanding of reality and the system founded on that. To that end, we could not solve any of the real problems our civilization has been confronted for thousands of years 
with unless we first collectively acknowledge those real problems with our civilization.

Freedom of expression must be combined with respect for known fact and a rational interpretation of it, the recipe for experiencing life within a healthy social environment. In line with that no one single person or organization is the owner of the information encrypted into the matrix of the universe. All of us are to uncover and correctly understand that, and then use it for the benefit of everyone. 

The only evolution human beings have experienced and are ever going to experience is in the way they understand reality. By extension, personal cognitive growth generates an increased collective awareness about the spiritual aspect of being human and of everything else. This way we collectively develop a better understanding of the purpose of our being here and a better, as in a more efficient way of experiencing the earth plane. When a significant number of the inhabitants of the planet share a correct understanding of what we know when it comes to the laws of the seen and unseen that govern the universe, that generates harmony not just in one country, not just for one people, but in the way we exist as a global community. That is the reason why disrespectful of his or her race or social status, every inhabitant of the planet must be encouraged in schools and through all available means to seek to experience personal cognitive and consciousness awareness growth. Religion and scientific materialism inhibit that. To make this possible, leaders of the community should be chosen not through popular vote but by and from among those who have an elevated understanding of what we know. They too could not efficiently govern, though, if the masses continue to be kept poor in spirit, as both religious institutions and a materialist academia relying blindly on empiricism do. To that end, we will have to replace the current political system of government with a merit one that in time should become a global entity. And since the success of Project Earth depends on that, we must create a universal education program that benefits every single member of the generations to come.

When we live our lives based on a falsification of universal truth, we act in disaccord with the harmonic vibrations of the principles behind the existence of the universe and the result of that is dis-harmony. If not addressed, dis-harmony tends to exacerbate into a dis-aster. The sages of the old explained the Earth-human’s predicaments as being the result of his inability to hear the music of the spheres, to "see" with the Eye of his mind the messages carried by those cosmic energies. If the Earth people are kept blind of the messages carried by energies constantly emanating from the Source and revealed to them thought the influences exerted by the asters, that results in an existential dis-aster.

When attuned to the energies of the spiritual, some call it the metaphysical, we can create together amazing technologies that make us look like Gods in the eyes of the uninitiated. More efficient technologies allow us to better protect the planet’s ability to sustain life. “Undoubtedly,” writes the Maya Elder Carlos Barrios in The Book of Destiny, “the greatest legacy the Mayan sage left us was their method of handling energies. The technical ability to clearly see the convergence of cosmic and terrestrial currents is used by Elders and wise men.”  Nikola Tesla’s message to the scientific community and to everyone else one hundred years ago was, “The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence." The more accurate our understanding of this aspect of reality, the more in tune our creative spirit is with Mother Nature and with universal order and  less fearful we are of the unknown.

Last but not the least when peace and harmony is established within our self the world becomes a reflection of that. As told in one of the Edgar Cayce readings, “peace must begin within self before there may be the activity or the application of self in such a manner as to bring peace in thy own household, in thine own heart, in thine own vicinity, in thine own state or nation.” (Reading 3976-28) It comes as no surprise to realize this is perfectly aligned with what we were once told by friends and relatives in high places: “You must learn to end the wars in your world by ending them in your mind.” (Pleiadian Times)

The same ancestral friends of ours in high places have told us that those who sought to keep the Earth-human blind of the blunders associated with his creation and this way unaware of his true potential have made him operate at the lower frequency of belief and did everything possible to cause him to lose contact with high origin. With the help of messengers initiated by the bringers of light into liberating knowledge, against the Custodial authorities’ wishes, many among the Earth-humans have been able to regain awareness of their once lost ability to have control, as spirit energy, 
over the choices they make and this way over how they individually and collectively experience the current life cycle. This way they realized it stays within their powers to put an end to living according to belief and to a materialist reductionist explanation of the nature and the purpose of life. These days they are no longer trapped within a manipulated perception of reality, for, as once promised, the truth has set them free."

(At this time the manuscript has not been proofed by a second party. The above text was revised, again, on July 22, 2022. Another draft was completed in the summer of 2023, then it reached its final form the month of December of the same year.)  


A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 
Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 




Thursday, July 29, 2021

A TIME OF CHANGE - TOPICS AND TARGETS


I don't remember how I ended up putting together this one, but it must have been the tempting challenge of remembering every single topic addressed in the book for the purpose of letting the potential reader know what to expect. I cannot imagine anyone going through the entire list, I am not even sure I was able to cover everything, and yet to some extent it would be very helpful for you to at least try. 

The list was upgraded every time something else would come to mind. What matters and you should know is that all these topics and targets are interrelated, closely connected, pieces of a game of puzzle revealing the most accurate picture of our civilization you were ever able to look at. 

For thousands of years all the way to present day humankind has been living a carefully organized fantasy meant to keep Earth people in the dark about the reality of what they are, of where they come from, and of the true purpose of experiencing the earth plane. That is about to change.


TOPICS AND TARGETS

Charles Darwin, the theory of evolution, gradualism, the 1953 Kettlewell peppered moth fraud, Richard Dawkins, Kenneth Miller, Chromosome 2 fusion, Stephen Jay Gould, Lamarck, Project Steven, DNA, Michael Behe, irreducible complexity, On the Origin of Species, The Descent of Man, Thomas Huxley, agnostic, Fred Hoyle, the Boeing 747 argument, PBS Evolution Series, Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial, Of Pandas and People, the First Amendment, the United States Constitution, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, 

National Center for Science Education, Eugenie Scott, Jonathan Wells, Discovery Institute, Dissent from Darwinism, Michael Shermer, Charles Manson, Hitler, Stalin, Scientology, Michael Denton, Mark Twain, video-game, SETI, virtual reality, origin of language, origin of Latin and Sanskrit, Seth Shostak, The Bible and slavery, The Torah, The Talmud, Talmud Jmmanuel, The Book of Genesis, The Book of Enoch, The Quran, the real meaning of the term god, Spinoza's god, Creationism, Quantum physics, Adam and Eve, Intelligent Design, Buddhism, Confucianism, Hinduism, yin and yang,

Greek Cosmogony, Plato, Socrates, Herodotus, Strabo, Jesus and his anti-religion teachings, Judaism, Islam, The Quran, Prophet Muhammad, the spiritual, the metaphysical, Consciousness, Aquarian children, Crystal Children, Indigo Children, Christmas, Easter, Lent, Halloween, Holi, Shakespeare, Albert Einstein, FOX News, Bill O’Reilly, George W. Bush, Glenn Beck, religion, politics, FDA, Coors Beer, the religious right, Pat Robertson, Charles Taylor, Joel Osteen, Billy and Franklin Graham, Ted Haggard, Jesus Camp, evangelism, money, Eastern Europe, the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, Peter the Zealot, Paul the Gnostic, Essenes, Gnostic literature, Catholic priests, rabbis, sheiks, sexual abuse of children, baptism, circumcision,

Petra, Helena Blavatsky, Egypt, the Pyramids of Giza, the Hawara Labyrinth, Egyptologists, Zahi Hawass, Mark Lehner, the Sphinx, Osirion, Cathari, Donation of Constantine and the rise of the Catholic Church, Catholic Encyclopedia, Wikipedia, Kabbalah, the Sephirothic Tree, tree of life, tree of knowledge, Mary Magdalene, Edgar Cayce, The Maya Book of Destiny, Rosemary Altea, Brian Weiss, Atlantis, Lemuria, Mesoamerica, Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code, Leonardo Da Vinci, Last Supper, Holy Blood, Holy Grail, The Jesus Mysteries, The Mona Lisa real mystery, Salvator Mundi, Gnostic Gospels, The Nag Hammadi Library, Tertullian, Mary Magdalene, the Christ, Paul or Saul of Tarsus, The Old Testament, The New Testament, Edward Leedskalnin, Coral Castle,

Dinosaurs, wolfs and dogs, house cats and wild cats, a Grand Canyon mystery, geology, Cuvier, Robert Chambers, Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, Pierre Plantard, Priory of Sion, France, progressive Jews, and the Freemasons, the Illuminati and the founding fathers of America, the Jewish people of the Roman empire and the rise of church Christianity, the Brotherhood of the Serpent, George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln, Rosicrucian, Washington Monument, Washington DC, Rome, Roman Empire, The Vatican, The pope, Father Bérenger Saunière, Rennes-le-Château, Marshal Pétain, Fascism, The Catholic and the Third Reich, Communism, Capitalism, Socialism, Atheism, Consumerism, 

UFO, USO, Hollow Earth, the 1680 UFO French Jetton, Orion, Pleiades, Billy Meier, The Pleiadian Mission, The Contact Notes, Barbara Marciniak, China and the Chinese pyramids, Maya and the Mayan Calendar, The Mayan Book of Life, Disclosure Project, Akhenaton, Nefertiti, Monotheism, the Akashic Record, The future of humankind ...

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public in this format free of charge. Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 


ATmeOfChangePG@gmail.com 


Monday, July 19, 2021

THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION OF THE ORIGIN OF EVERYTHING (Short video demonstration)


What you see in this video is the basis for the argument made in A Time of Change in favor of a new explanation for the origin of life forms and of everything else having the appearance of material. Because everything in the universe is energy and information, quantum physics is the only science that is going to be able to explain that. That and our awareness of the spiritual aspect of what we perceive as material reality. There is a reason why different people following their own path of discovery came to the same conclusion. In the end, things have the same meaning for everyone, expert or non-expert alike, everywhere in this universe. 

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 





Thursday, April 8, 2021

EVOLUTIONARY LIGHTNING STRIKES OUT, AGAIN.


In an article published on online recently, the readers were made aware that

"Lightning strikes on the early Earth over the course of 1 billion years could have been key to the formation of the first life on our planet, according to a new study." 

So, what was this "new study" about? It certainly did not reveal a scientific fact, and the proof of that is their admission that his "could have been the key to the formation of the first life on our planet." The use of the conditional past tense implies they do not know for sure, new study and all, which makes one wonder why as a scientist make a public statement about what might have happen. According to English language rules, "conditional grammar expresses an idea that is not real. It did not happen." As a result, this group of scientists was sharing with the world a "novel" idea that was not real, the assumption that lightning might have started a process that led to the appearance of life on planet Earth. The subliminal admission there was that after more than 160 years from the time Darwin published On the Origin of Species, with them claiming over and over on all channels this is a revolutionary work by a revolutionary mind, they still do not know what caused the appearance of life on this planet or anywhere else in the universe for that matter. Sure enough, as you are going to see in A Time of Change, On the Origin of Species is not about the origin of species. 

For those who pay attention to the meaning of the words, the title of the paper reveals the study does not come even close to explaining the formation of the first life forms. It only suggests, key word, repeat lightning strikes over 1 billion years might have been "a major facilitator of prebiotic phosphorus reduction on early Earth." That is an assumed development. Nevertheless, they suppose it opened the door to a process of evolution that over millions and millions of year has produced, they say, the amazing diversity of life forms we have today on this planet, thousands of different mammals, reptiles, birds, fishes, insects, and yes, humans too. Except that, contrary to what the evolutionists are claiming, there is zero evidence that process really took place. Despite that, they teach evolution in schools and universities as if it were science fact while for more than a decade now churches decided it would be good for business to endorse evolution and praise Darwin all the way to the imaginary kingdom of what is now a gradualist God. They did that afraid, and rightfully so that the reality of intelligent design is going to make the entire dogma of religion collapse as a house of cards, so, we ended up with both creationists and evolutionists rejecting design. 

There is another aspect of what we have hear that needs to be addressed. The same article says, 

"The new study — in the journal Nature Communications — suggests trillions of lightning strikes spanning about 1 billion years helped create phosphorous, a key ingredient in the formation of life." 
(Lightning strikes as a major facilitator of prebiotic phosphorus reduction on early Earth, by Benjamin L. Hess, Sandra Piazolo, Jason Harvey, March 16, 2021) (axios.com)

Nature Communications is an open access science journal, and that calls for us to be extremely circumspect about the validity of everything published under its patronage. Open access means, you pay, they publish your paper, then your paper and you as its author gains some measure of popularity because it has appeared in a science journal. As a result, you can claim now you are a published researcher. This opens the door to book publishing and to the lecturing circuit where you will diligently promote your book on something that is perceived as been peer reviewed even though no one known if this was the case or not. In addition to that, precisely what we have in this instance, somebody with an agenda is going to quote from your published paper to make a point in line with the old reality-defying adagio saying evolution is fact, fact, fact, as the good people of Axios did. In other words, you pay to have a so-called research paper stating something false labeled science that someone else would reference to make the case for evolution even though reality tells a different story about biological gradualism and about the history of life on this planet in general.

Most open access science journals claim they peer-review every single submission.They do not. A less known fact by the large public, there are huge problems with peer reviewing. How huge? There have been a number of tests conducted by certain scientific organizations and journals to make sure the open access system is credible and reliable, and the results were not exactly reassuring. 

One of those tests was conducted a few years ago by Science magazine. It used a spoof cancer study containing errors any honest reviewer would have easily caught. A significant number of open access science journals agreed to publish it, over one hundred of them. There is money to be made in the scientific paper publishing business too, and while they claimed they were peer-reviewing everything published, many of them did not and they published the faulty study the way it was, errors and all. There are close to 12,000 open access journals in America alone, and there is a strong possibility this was not the only instance when a faulty study claimed to have been peer-reviewed when in reality it was not was published.

About this "new study" on the effect lightning might have had on the appearance of life on Earth, Benjamin Hess, one of the authors of the paper declared that, “This work helps us understand how life may have formed on Earth and how it could still be forming on other Earth-like planets.” The first problem with his claim that jumps right at you aside from the already mentioned here problem with evolutionists always making "may have" and "could" as part of their argument, meaning their input is only an assumption is that the new theory was actually decades old, something the majority of the public would not know. This makes one also question the real intent of those involved in the study, and related to that, their honesty. 

According to an article published in Sky News in 2016,

"For nearly nine decades, science’s favorite explanation for the origin of life has been the “primordial soup”. This is the idea that life began from a series of chemical reactions in a warm pond on Earth’s surface, triggered by an external energy source such as lightning strike or ultraviolet (UV) light." (Have We Been Wrong About Life's Origin, by Arunas L. Radzvilavicius, at the time a Postdoctoral Researcher in Evolutionary Biology with the University of Pennsylvania.) 

To give the theory of evolution an otherwise false aura of academic legitimacy, biology is no longer just biology, it is "Evolutionary Biology," and yet no one could tell the difference, in a rational way that is. 

Other than that, the fact is the "lightening theory" was thrown around for many years now, meaning at the best the authors of the "new study" were assuming the same thing others have been assuming for decades, with no one having evidence this was what happened, leads us to asking the same question asked before: What was the real reason for publishing and discussing the results of a "new study" that is neither new, nor a real study. Are we to believe the scientists associated with this farce were completely in the dark about the fact that in the past 100 years other scientists would once in a while propose the same thing, that lightning may have caused life to miraculously appear on our planet, and that same as the authors of the new study none of them had any idea if this did, indeed, happen?

They assume things all the time, could have/may have, and that is because they either have no idea what happened or do not want to share with the public what they know about what really happened. Evolutionists are confidently throwing around 
such non-factual concepts as abiogenesis, something supposedly describing the spontaneous birth of life forms from chemicals and other amorphous material, which is as much of a miracle as the six-day creation in the Genesis is, and speciation, which is imaginary gradual evolution spelled differently. In reality, and as basically even the authors of this study admit, no one knows how life has appeared on our planet, a reminder of the fact that, indeed, Darwin's On the Origin of the Species does not address the question of the origin of species and that the title of his book is a false label placed on an empty box. 

Most everyone in the scientific community would agree, off the record of course, the claim that gradual biological evolution could occur spontaneously in nature and that on top of everything else it occurred at a slow pace over millions of years does not just defy common sense. It is biologically and genetically impossible, and one does not need to be a biologist or a geneticist to be able to understand that. Basic common sense does the trick just fine. 

Random natural events do not code genetic information, which is what we have in the case of the DNA and of other genetic devices, nor could an assumed process of adaptation generate coherent changes in an existing genetic code during the life of the species. Only a genetic engineer could do that. Then there is the indisputable fact that, to be able to reproduce as a species and this perpetuate the species, you would have to have all you organs together and in working condition from day one of your setting foot on this planet, separate male and separate female sex organs included. If you don't have the reproduction organs, and this is known as the queen of all problems for the theory of evolution, you are the last generation of your species. 

According to evolutionists, all your species' organs have been in a transitional stage for millions of years. The meaning of that is you were a non-functioning species for all that time. That defies common sense. In line with that, it means  natural selection, otherwise an imaginary process, had nothing of value to hold on to, to preserve. A rational logical conclusion, neither gradual mutations, nor natural election happened. 

As publicly admitted even by some of those on-again, off-again supporters of Darwinism, with American evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould making a strong case against evolution only to be forced by editorial staff serving the protectors of the status quo to declare evolution fact, there has been a code of silence imposed on scientists on this subject, something similar to the UFO phenomenon 
and the contacts we made for thousands of years with extraterrestrials being a taboo topic for the media. Albert Einstein, for example, who was not just a brilliant scientist but also a philosopher, would weigh in on all sorts of topics of human interest. He has never discussed evolution publicly, one way or the other, and yet we know for a fact he was well-aware of the controversy. 

The code of silence imposed and enforced by the academia, the reason for that is one does not want to give comfort to creationists, resulted in only scientists entertaining beliefs in the existence of some kind of higher power being heard speaking publicly against evolution, and even though some of them are Nobel Prize recipients in all sorts of science related fields, the evolution propaganda machine calls them creationists and invites the public to dismiss their otherwise valid scientific argument against gradualism. 

These days a Catholic Church and a Church of England supposedly working for that delusion God, as described by Richard Dawkins, the front man of the pro-evolution cabala within the academia, have officially endorsed evolution, and Atheist Dawkins cheerfully interviews men of God, in the house of God, who now say evolution is fact and that intelligent design should not be taught in schools. As you are going to see, they do not do that because they sincerely believe evolution is fact, almost no one out there truly believes that and we have the Gallup polls to prove it. They do it because they realized a public aware of the true meaning of the reality of intelligent design would have catastrophic consequences for the existence of their religious institutions, reason why they joined the evolutionists in Dover, Pennsylvania, where in 2005, a judge appointed by someone behind the government put a what in fact was an unconstitutional ban on discussing ID in schools. The actual reason why they would rather endorse evolution then have intelligent design discussed in science class is that they too want to protect a status quo the survival of their multi-billion-dollar preaching of irrational belief industry depends on. 

Creationists and evolutionists were equally happy when at the end of that 2005 sham trial, a judge of no scientific expertise declared evolution fact and officially banned, as planned, discussing intelligent design in public schools under the false pretense that ID was religion. This was no normal judicial process, and the entities behind our government needed the ban because intelligent design stands exactly for what Francis Crick, co-discoverer of the DNA and Nobel Prize recipient for that had declared in his 1981 book Life Itself about the origin of the DNA: The DNA is not from Earth. It was created by an advanced civilization and was brought here for the purpose of preserving a special knowledge by the way of an experiment that was to result in the most advanced civilization in the entire universe.

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3