Friday, July 15, 2022

WE EXIST THE WAY WE UNDERSTAND REALITY. - An Excerpt From A Time of Change, Volume 2.


"The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so." 
                                                       - Mark Twain
"Church stands for gathering, and the original churches were not houses of worship. They were houses of learning where men and women would get together to share and discuss knowledge while searching for a correct understanding of what they knew. Because of that, even though the institution of religion must be eradicated, one should not burn down churches, synagogues, and mosques. They are to be once again used by the community as gathering places where people will return to worshiping knowledge and reason instead of imaginary gods.

Some consider religion, and rightfully so, a branch of the entertainment industry. Among others, both preachers and entertainers put on an act by pretending to be something they are not. They both use light, sound, costumes, makeup, both work with a script, and in many instances they both get paid big money for doing that. No doubts about it, what you see on stage during a church revival is an act, and while according to Matthew 10:8 Jesus tells his disciples “Freely you have received; freely give,” to watch the show put on by Joel Osteen, Benny Hinn, Franklin Graham, or Creflo Dollar, to name only a few among the most known Bible-toting stage actors, you must buy a ticket. Someone has even written a book called Performing the Word: Preaching as Theater. It glorifies the vaudevillian approach to ministering, an approach that justifies the demand by many among the population of the planet that churches and preachers pay taxes like all the other for-profit institutions and entertainers. (See “20 Richest Pastors in the World In 2019," YouTube, running time 16 minutes 26 seconds.) The reason why our government does not collect taxes from them is that our government needs them to help it control the masses.

Be it land, buildings, art, or libraries, everything own by churches 
was not earned and is the property of the people. In that respect it is for the congregation, and not for the religious hierarchy to choose the topics of conversation in churches, especially when the priest’s salary comes from money donated by the people that make the congregation. Unlike school and higher education teachers who receive an academic education in a specific field of human interest, at the seminary or at religious universities the priests are taught how to make believers believe the irrational belief they preach is absolute truth. In the parts of the world where houses of worship are still subsidized by the state, in many instances the sacerdotal class is openly at the service of the government and play the political game to its advantage and to the advantage of officials that pass laws allowing for money to be diverted from public funds to the bank accounts of religious institutions. 

In accord with the request by Jesus that “Freely you have received; freely give,” in the original non-religious Gnostic churches, knowledge was, indeed, shared freely with everyone. The free-knowledge concept was meant to foster civilization advancement and it is still valid today, it will always be, and yet most governments are asking young men and women, the future of civilization Earth to pay significant tuition fees to get an education that on occasion consists of false or outdated information, as is the case with the teaching of the theory of evolution in colleges and universities as fact. Receiving an education is something that benefits not just our young men and women but also civilization Earth, which is why education should be free. Churches that make millions of tax-free dollars and were allowed to set shop on every college and university campus in the country preach from a book implying that seeking knowledge is a sin and calls ignorance of our spiritual nature a blessing. Being present on colleges campuses all over America despite that, is another thing revealing that religious institutions have been always used by those at the controls of civilization Earth as an instrument of perception manipulation, something that makes the people of the planet live their lives in a way that benefits the status quo. For, much to one’s surprise, we live the way we perceive reality, and the manipulators, our governments included, are aware of that.

Schools and universities are to expose students to everything we know about the universe, natural law, about our true history, the nature of being human, and the purpose of life, as well as about our future projects and objectives as a civilization. Instead of pretending we have answers we do not actually have, schools must make the new generation aware of our current cognitive limits as a civilization. This way young men and women will look for the answers we do not have yet. There should be no need for politicians with an agenda to push for laws allowing for the use of critical thinking in schools, for questioning the academic authority of a few, or for challenging absurd assumptions presented to the student body as scientific fact. This is normal human behavior associated with social rules deriving from our natural rights and common sense. “Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty,” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter sent from Paris to Uriah Forrest on December 31, 1787. This is not exactly what we have going on these days in America and all over the world, and the question is how did we end up in this situation?

Some feel uncomfortable, even afraid when invited to enter uncharted territories and worlds beyond their comfortable belief. Positive change could not happen without us traveling beyond our current cognitive limits. Fear is a natural feeling, and one should never pretend it is not there if that happens. As someone once said, acknowledging fear is the beginning of conquering it. One must not allow his or her spirit to be dominated and controlled by fear, though, for fear is what makes people act and react the way someone wants them to act and react. This was why we were once told, “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” Fear inhibits our instinctual inclination toward acting in harmony with the law that governs the universe. Fear deprives us of our natural impulse to change a certain state of affair that is out of sync with the frequency of honesty and truth. Change that benefits the greater good could not happen without challenging the status quo, the current mentality, the current understanding of reality and the system founded on that. To that end, we could not solve any of the real problems our civilization has been confronted for thousands of years 
with unless we first collectively acknowledge those real problems with our civilization.

Freedom of expression must be combined with respect for known fact and a rational interpretation of it, the recipe for experiencing life within a healthy social environment. In line with that no one single person or organization is the owner of the information encrypted into the matrix of the universe. All of us are to uncover and correctly understand that, and then use it for the benefit of everyone. 

The only evolution human beings have experienced and are ever going to experience is in the way they understand reality. By extension, personal cognitive growth generates an increased collective awareness about the spiritual aspect of being human and of everything else. This way we collectively develop a better understanding of the purpose of our being here and a better, as in a more efficient way of experiencing the earth plane. When a significant number of the inhabitants of the planet share a correct understanding of what we know when it comes to the laws of the seen and unseen that govern the universe, that generates harmony not just in one country, not just for one people, but in the way we exist as a global community. That is the reason why disrespectful of his or her race or social status, every inhabitant of the planet must be encouraged in schools and through all available means to seek to experience personal cognitive and consciousness awareness growth. Religion and scientific materialism inhibit that. To make this possible, leaders of the community should be chosen not through popular vote but by and from among those who have an elevated understanding of what we know. They too could not efficiently govern, though, if the masses continue to be kept poor in spirit, as both religious institutions and a materialist academia relying blindly on empiricism do. To that end, we will have to replace the current political system of government with a merit one that in time should become a global entity. And since the success of Project Earth depends on that, we must create a universal education program that benefits every single member of the generations to come.

When we live our lives based on a falsification of universal truth, we act in disaccord with the harmonic vibrations of the principles behind the existence of the universe and the result of that is dis-harmony. If not addressed, dis-harmony tends to exacerbate into a dis-aster. The sages of the old explained the Earth-human’s predicaments as being the result of his inability to hear the music of the spheres, to "see" with the Eye of his mind the messages carried by those cosmic energies. If the Earth people are kept blind of the messages carried by energies constantly emanating from the Source and revealed to them thought the influences exerted by the asters, that results in an existential dis-aster.

When attuned to the energies of the spiritual, some call it the metaphysical, we can create together amazing technologies that make us look like Gods in the eyes of the uninitiated. More efficient technologies allow us to better protect the planet’s ability to sustain life. “Undoubtedly,” writes the Maya Elder Carlos Barrios in The Book of Destiny, “the greatest legacy the Mayan sage left us was their method of handling energies. The technical ability to clearly see the convergence of cosmic and terrestrial currents is used by Elders and wise men.”  Nikola Tesla’s message to the scientific community and to everyone else one hundred years ago was, “The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence." The more accurate our understanding of this aspect of reality, the more in tune our creative spirit is with Mother Nature and with universal order and  less fearful we are of the unknown.

Last but not the least when peace and harmony is established within our self the world becomes a reflection of that. As told in one of the Edgar Cayce readings, “peace must begin within self before there may be the activity or the application of self in such a manner as to bring peace in thy own household, in thine own heart, in thine own vicinity, in thine own state or nation.” (Reading 3976-28) It comes as no surprise to realize this is perfectly aligned with what we were once told by friends and relatives in high places: “You must learn to end the wars in your world by ending them in your mind.” (Pleiadian Times)

The same ancestral friends of ours in high places have told us that those who sought to keep the Earth-human blind of the blunders associated with his creation and this way unaware of his true potential have made him operate at the lower frequency of belief and did everything possible to cause him to lose contact with high origin. With the help of messengers initiated by the bringers of light into liberating knowledge, against the Custodial authorities’ wishes, many among the Earth-humans have been able to regain awareness of their once lost ability to have control, as spirit energy, 
over the choices they make and this way over how they individually and collectively experience the current life cycle. This way they realized it stays within their powers to put an end to living according to belief and to a materialist reductionist explanation of the nature and the purpose of life. These days they are no longer trapped within a manipulated perception of reality, for, as once promised, the truth has set them free."

(At this time the manuscript has not been proofed by a second party. The above text was revised, again, on July 22, 2022. Another draft was completed in the summer of 2023, then it reached its final form the month of December of the same year.)  


A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only be shared it with others free of charge. Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of either the entire set of documents or any part of it. 




Thursday, July 29, 2021

A TIME OF CHANGE - TOPICS AND TARGETS


I don't remember how I ended up putting together this one, but it must have been the tempting challenge of remembering every single topic addressed in the book for the purpose of letting the potential reader know what to expect. I cannot imagine anyone going through the entire list, I am not even sure I was able to cover everything, and yet to some extent it would be very helpful for you to at least try. 

The list was upgraded every time something else would come to mind. What matters and you should know is that all these topics and targets are interrelated, closely connected, pieces of a game of puzzle revealing the most accurate picture of our civilization you were ever able to look at. 

For thousands of years all the way to present day humankind has been living a carefully organized fantasy meant to keep Earth people in the dark about the reality of what they are, of where they come from, and of the true purpose of experiencing the earth plane. That is about to change.


TOPICS AND TARGETS

Charles Darwin, the theory of evolution, gradualism, the 1953 Kettlewell peppered moth fraud, Richard Dawkins, Kenneth Miller, Chromosome 2 fusion, Stephen Jay Gould, Lamarck, Project Steven, DNA, Michael Behe, irreducible complexity, On the Origin of Species, The Descent of Man, Thomas Huxley, agnostic, Fred Hoyle, the Boeing 747 argument, PBS Evolution Series, Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial, Of Pandas and People, the First Amendment, the United States Constitution, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, 

National Center for Science Education, Eugenie Scott, Jonathan Wells, Discovery Institute, Dissent from Darwinism, Michael Shermer, Charles Manson, Hitler, Stalin, Scientology, Michael Denton, Mark Twain, video-game, SETI, virtual reality, origin of language, origin of Latin and Sanskrit, Seth Shostak, The Bible and slavery, The Torah, The Talmud, Talmud Jmmanuel, The Book of Genesis, The Book of Enoch, The Quran, the real meaning of the term god, Spinoza's god, Creationism, Quantum physics, Adam and Eve, Intelligent Design, Buddhism, Confucianism, Hinduism, yin and yang,

Greek Cosmogony, Plato, Socrates, Herodotus, Strabo, Jesus and his anti-religion teachings, Judaism, Islam, The Quran, Prophet Muhammad, the spiritual, the metaphysical, Consciousness, Aquarian children, Crystal Children, Indigo Children, Christmas, Easter, Lent, Halloween, Holi, Shakespeare, Albert Einstein, FOX News, Bill O’Reilly, George W. Bush, Glenn Beck, religion, politics, FDA, Coors Beer, the religious right, Pat Robertson, Charles Taylor, Joel Osteen, Billy and Franklin Graham, Ted Haggard, Jesus Camp, evangelism, money, Eastern Europe, the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, Peter the Zealot, Paul the Gnostic, Essenes, Gnostic literature, Catholic priests, rabbis, sheiks, sexual abuse of children, baptism, circumcision,

Petra, Helena Blavatsky, Egypt, the Pyramids of Giza, the Hawara Labyrinth, Egyptologists, Zahi Hawass, Mark Lehner, the Sphinx, Osirion, Cathari, Donation of Constantine and the rise of the Catholic Church, Catholic Encyclopedia, Wikipedia, Kabbalah, the Sephirothic Tree, tree of life, tree of knowledge, Mary Magdalene, Edgar Cayce, The Maya Book of Destiny, Rosemary Altea, Brian Weiss, Atlantis, Lemuria, Mesoamerica, Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code, Leonardo Da Vinci, Last Supper, Holy Blood, Holy Grail, The Jesus Mysteries, The Mona Lisa real mystery, Salvator Mundi, Gnostic Gospels, The Nag Hammadi Library, Tertullian, Mary Magdalene, the Christ, Paul or Saul of Tarsus, The Old Testament, The New Testament, Edward Leedskalnin, Coral Castle,

Dinosaurs, wolfs and dogs, house cats and wild cats, a Grand Canyon mystery, geology, Cuvier, Robert Chambers, Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, Pierre Plantard, Priory of Sion, France, progressive Jews, and the Freemasons, the Illuminati and the founding fathers of America, the Jewish people of the Roman empire and the rise of church Christianity, the Brotherhood of the Serpent, George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln, Rosicrucian, Washington Monument, Washington DC, Rome, Roman Empire, The Vatican, The pope, Father Bérenger Saunière, Rennes-le-Château, Marshal Pétain, Fascism, The Catholic and the Third Reich, Communism, Capitalism, Socialism, Atheism, Consumerism, 

UFO, USO, Hollow Earth, the 1680 UFO French Jetton, Orion, Pleiades, Billy Meier, The Pleiadian Mission, The Contact Notes, Barbara Marciniak, China and the Chinese pyramids, Maya and the Mayan Calendar, The Mayan Book of Life, Disclosure Project, Akhenaton, Nefertiti, Monotheism, the Akashic Record, The future of humankind ...

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public in this format free of charge. Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of either the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 (PDF active) 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 


ATmeOfChangePG@gmail.com 


Monday, July 19, 2021

THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION OF THE ORIGIN OF EVERYTHING (Short video demonstration)


What you see in this video is the basis for the argument made in A Time of Change in favor of a new explanation for the origin of life forms and of everything else having the appearance of material. Because everything in the universe is energy and information, quantum physics is the only science that is going to be able to explain that. That and our awareness of the spiritual aspect of what we perceive as material reality. There is a reason why different people following their own path of discovery came to the same conclusion. In the end, things have the same meaning for everyone, expert or non-expert alike, everywhere in this universe. 

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge in this format. It can only be shared it with others free of charge. opyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of either the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 (PDF active)    

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 





Thursday, April 8, 2021

EVOLUTIONARY LIGHTNING STRIKES OUT, AGAIN.


In an article published on online recently, the readers were made aware that

"Lightning strikes on the early Earth over the course of 1 billion years could have been key to the formation of the first life on our planet, according to a new study." 

So, what was this "new study" about? It certainly did not reveal a scientific fact, and the proof of that is their admission that his "could have been the key to the formation of the first life on our planet." The use of the conditional past tense implies they do not know for sure, new study and all, which makes one wonder why as a scientist make a public statement about what might have happen. According to English language rules, "conditional grammar expresses an idea that is not real. It did not happen." As a result, this group of scientists was sharing with the world a "novel" idea that was not real, the assumption that lightning might have started a process that led to the appearance of life on planet Earth. The subliminal admission there was that after more than 160 years from the time Darwin published On the Origin of Species, with them claiming over and over on all channels this is a revolutionary work by a revolutionary mind, they still do not know what caused the appearance of life on this planet or anywhere else in the universe for that matter. Sure enough, as you are going to see in A Time of Change, On the Origin of Species is not about the origin of species. 

For those who pay attention to the meaning of the words, the title of the paper reveals the study does not come even close to explaining the formation of the first life forms. It only suggests, key word, repeat lightning strikes over 1 billion years might have been "a major facilitator of prebiotic phosphorus reduction on early Earth." That is an assumed development. Nevertheless, they suppose it opened the door to a process of evolution that over millions and millions of year has produced, they say, the amazing diversity of life forms we have today on this planet, thousands of different mammals, reptiles, birds, fishes, insects, and yes, humans too. Except that, contrary to what the evolutionists are claiming, there is zero evidence that process really took place. Despite that, they teach evolution in schools and universities as if it were science fact while for more than a decade now churches decided it would be good for business to endorse evolution and praise Darwin all the way to the imaginary kingdom of what is now a gradualist God. They did that afraid, and rightfully so that the reality of intelligent design is going to make the entire dogma of religion collapse as a house of cards, so, we ended up with both creationists and evolutionists rejecting design. 

There is another aspect of what we have hear that needs to be addressed. The same article says, 

"The new study — in the journal Nature Communications — suggests trillions of lightning strikes spanning about 1 billion years helped create phosphorous, a key ingredient in the formation of life." 
(Lightning strikes as a major facilitator of prebiotic phosphorus reduction on early Earth, by Benjamin L. Hess, Sandra Piazolo, Jason Harvey, March 16, 2021) (axios.com)

Nature Communications is an open access science journal, and that calls for us to be extremely circumspect about the validity of everything published under its patronage. Open access means, you pay, they publish your paper, then your paper and you as its author gains some measure of popularity because it has appeared in a science journal. As a result, you can claim now you are a published researcher. This opens the door to book publishing and to the lecturing circuit where you will diligently promote your book on something that is perceived as been peer reviewed even though no one known if this was the case or not. In addition to that, precisely what we have in this instance, somebody with an agenda is going to quote from your published paper to make a point in line with the old reality-defying adagio saying evolution is fact, fact, fact, as the good people of Axios did. In other words, you pay to have a so-called research paper stating something false labeled science that someone else would reference to make the case for evolution even though reality tells a different story about biological gradualism and about the history of life on this planet in general.

Most open access science journals claim they peer-review every single submission.They do not. A less known fact by the large public, there are huge problems with peer reviewing. How huge? There have been a number of tests conducted by certain scientific organizations and journals to make sure the open access system is credible and reliable, and the results were not exactly reassuring. 

One of those tests was conducted a few years ago by Science magazine. It used a spoof cancer study containing errors any honest reviewer would have easily caught. A significant number of open access science journals agreed to publish it, over one hundred of them. There is money to be made in the scientific paper publishing business too, and while they claimed they were peer-reviewing everything published, many of them did not and they published the faulty study the way it was, errors and all. There are close to 12,000 open access journals in America alone, and there is a strong possibility this was not the only instance when a faulty study claimed to have been peer-reviewed when in reality it was not was published.

About this "new study" on the effect lightning might have had on the appearance of life on Earth, Benjamin Hess, one of the authors of the paper declared that, “This work helps us understand how life may have formed on Earth and how it could still be forming on other Earth-like planets.” The first problem with his claim that jumps right at you aside from the already mentioned here problem with evolutionists always making "may have" and "could" as part of their argument, meaning their input is only an assumption is that the new theory was actually decades old, something the majority of the public would not know. This makes one also question the real intent of those involved in the study, and related to that, their honesty. 

According to an article published in Sky News in 2016,

"For nearly nine decades, science’s favorite explanation for the origin of life has been the “primordial soup”. This is the idea that life began from a series of chemical reactions in a warm pond on Earth’s surface, triggered by an external energy source such as lightning strike or ultraviolet (UV) light." (Have We Been Wrong About Life's Origin, by Arunas L. Radzvilavicius, at the time a Postdoctoral Researcher in Evolutionary Biology with the University of Pennsylvania.) 

To give the theory of evolution an otherwise false aura of academic legitimacy, biology is no longer just biology, it is "Evolutionary Biology," and yet no one could tell the difference, in a rational way that is. 

Other than that, the fact is the "lightening theory" was thrown around for many years now, meaning at the best the authors of the "new study" were assuming the same thing others have been assuming for decades, with no one having evidence this was what happened, leads us to asking the same question asked before: What was the real reason for publishing and discussing the results of a "new study" that is neither new, nor a real study. Are we to believe the scientists associated with this farce were completely in the dark about the fact that in the past 100 years other scientists would once in a while propose the same thing, that lightning may have caused life to miraculously appear on our planet, and that same as the authors of the new study none of them had any idea if this did, indeed, happen?

They assume things all the time, could have/may have, and that is because they either have no idea what happened or do not want to share with the public what they know about what really happened. Evolutionists are confidently throwing around 
such non-factual concepts as abiogenesis, something supposedly describing the spontaneous birth of life forms from chemicals and other amorphous material, which is as much of a miracle as the six-day creation in the Genesis is, and speciation, which is imaginary gradual evolution spelled differently. In reality, and as basically even the authors of this study admit, no one knows how life has appeared on our planet, a reminder of the fact that, indeed, Darwin's On the Origin of the Species does not address the question of the origin of species and that the title of his book is a false label placed on an empty box. 

Most everyone in the scientific community would agree, off the record of course, the claim that gradual biological evolution could occur spontaneously in nature and that on top of everything else it occurred at a slow pace over millions of years does not just defy common sense. It is biologically and genetically impossible, and one does not need to be a biologist or a geneticist to be able to understand that. Basic common sense does the trick just fine. 

Random natural events do not code genetic information, which is what we have in the case of the DNA and of other genetic devices, nor could an assumed process of adaptation generate coherent changes in an existing genetic code during the life of the species. Only a genetic engineer could do that. Then there is the indisputable fact that, to be able to reproduce as a species and this perpetuate the species, you would have to have all you organs together and in working condition from day one of your setting foot on this planet, separate male and separate female sex organs included. If you don't have the reproduction organs, and this is known as the queen of all problems for the theory of evolution, you are the last generation of your species. 

According to evolutionists, all your species' organs have been in a transitional stage for millions of years. The meaning of that is you were a non-functioning species for all that time. That defies common sense. In line with that, it means  natural selection, otherwise an imaginary process, had nothing of value to hold on to, to preserve. A rational logical conclusion, neither gradual mutations, nor natural election happened. 

As publicly admitted even by some of those on-again, off-again supporters of Darwinism, with American evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould making a strong case against evolution only to be forced by editorial staff serving the protectors of the status quo to declare evolution fact, there has been a code of silence imposed on scientists on this subject, something similar to the UFO phenomenon 
and the contacts we made for thousands of years with extraterrestrials being a taboo topic for the media. Albert Einstein, for example, who was not just a brilliant scientist but also a philosopher, would weigh in on all sorts of topics of human interest. He has never discussed evolution publicly, one way or the other, and yet we know for a fact he was well-aware of the controversy. 

The code of silence imposed and enforced by the academia, the reason for that is one does not want to give comfort to creationists, resulted in only scientists entertaining beliefs in the existence of some kind of higher power being heard speaking publicly against evolution, and even though some of them are Nobel Prize recipients in all sorts of science related fields, the evolution propaganda machine calls them creationists and invites the public to dismiss their otherwise valid scientific argument against gradualism. 

These days a Catholic Church and a Church of England supposedly working for that delusion God, as described by Richard Dawkins, the front man of the pro-evolution cabala within the academia, have officially endorsed evolution, and Atheist Dawkins cheerfully interviews men of God, in the house of God, who now say evolution is fact and that intelligent design should not be taught in schools. As you are going to see, they do not do that because they sincerely believe evolution is fact, almost no one out there truly believes that and we have the Gallup polls to prove it. They do it because they realized a public aware of the true meaning of the reality of intelligent design would have catastrophic consequences for the existence of their religious institutions, reason why they joined the evolutionists in Dover, Pennsylvania, where in 2005, a judge appointed by someone behind the government put a what in fact was an unconstitutional ban on discussing ID in schools. The actual reason why they would rather endorse evolution then have intelligent design discussed in science class is that they too want to protect a status quo the survival of their multi-billion-dollar preaching of irrational belief industry depends on. 

Creationists and evolutionists were equally happy when at the end of that 2005 sham trial, a judge of no scientific expertise declared evolution fact and officially banned, as planned, discussing intelligent design in public schools under the false pretense that ID was religion. This was no normal judicial process, and the entities behind our government needed the ban because intelligent design stands exactly for what Francis Crick, co-discoverer of the DNA and Nobel Prize recipient for that had declared in his 1981 book Life Itself about the origin of the DNA: The DNA is not from Earth. It was created by an advanced civilization and was brought here for the purpose of preserving a special knowledge by the way of an experiment that was to result in the most advanced civilization in the entire universe.

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge in this format. It could only be shared free of charge with others. Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of either the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 (PDF active)    

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 



Thursday, December 10, 2020

BERTRAND RUSSELL: IMMORTALITY AND SOUL


Of a religious, political, or of any other nature for that matter, humans taking sides in a debate that turned into a dispute accept by default as true every single claim made by the members of their adopted community. Also by default, they cry "False!" about everything stated by an opposition they were made to see as the enemy. The mentality behind that kind of attitude is, we are always right and the others are always wrong. To the unattached observer, since they are not seen through an ideological filter, things are the way they look. 

In line with this at times annoying reality, not everything stated by a human universally accepted as being an evil person is false, and not everything ever written or claimed by someone whose knowledge and judgement society has come to admire is true. Let us take, for example, the case of British philosopher Bertrand Russell and his opinion on immortality and soul.

The focus here is going to be on his What Is the Soul? A piece he apparently originally wrote in 1928, there is an 1947 and a 1957 version of it and while he made several stylistic and terminology related adjustments, one thing these three versions have in common is him being wrong about mind/soul and physical body being one and the same thing.   

In the 1928 version, right from the beginning Russell admits that "When I was young we all knew, or thought we knew, that a man consists of a soul and a body." Not all people knew that but this is what he thought was the case. What happened next, apparently unbeknownst to him, an extremely reductionist materialist segment of the scientific community hijacked the conversation, something done under the guise of addressing the false claims made in religion about the immortality of the body, not of the soul though. Indeed, only a few would notice, Bertrand included, when in the middle of a heated debate, that the immortality of the body is something completely different from the immortality of the soul.

'The rising of the dead' still preached in many churches implies that currently dead human bodies will one day rise in spirit and body from their grave, the other rather vague implication being that the soul and the body are one. In essence, the position taken by reductionist materialist scientists and church theologians is similar, and much to many rationalists' disbelief they are more than once on the same page. The only difference consists in the kinds of stories they tell about what both erroneously describe as fact. 

The way empiricists have found it fit to address this rising of the dead nonsense in the Bible was by assuming that either such a thing as soul does not exist, or that since the soul and the body are one, when the body decomposes after our passing, so does the soul. The soul, however, is energy, and as the First Law of Thermodynamics says, energy can neither be created, nor destroyed. It can only be altered in form, transformed in a different kind of energy. In other words, soul energy is immortal, and since we are the soul within the body, we too are immortal. The immortality of the soul, on one hand, and the impossible immortality of the body, on the other hand, preached by some religious institutions but not by a Paul who, as you are going to see in the book, in one of his letters rightfully declares that the perishable could not ascend as imperishable, are different notions materialist scientists participating in the effort to protect the status quo by, among others, keeping Earth-humans unaware of their spiritual nature decided to treat as one and the same thing. 

Without a doubt, not only that materialist evolutionists and theologians are wrong about the soul, the fact that they both directly or indirectly deny the reality of a soul residing within the body but being apart from the body, as well as the immortality of the soul is no accident. One major way of controlling the people of the planet, this was a coordinated misrepresentation of the true nature of being human, part of a scheme meant to hide from the Earth-humans their true potential. This false perception of reality determines the way they live, the way they understand their relation to the out there, the consequence of that being the state of almost constant state of crisis humankind has been experiencing for thousands of years. 

With the advent of quantum physics, many scientists would conclude now material reality is not really material, or real, and that what we perceive as material is a holographic multi-dimensional projection, a mind over "matter" phenomenon. In plain words, the observed at the sensory level material reality, something that is nothing but energy, is basically an illusion. As a result, philosophers relying heavily on good science were of the opinion now that, in a sense, the body too was a product of the mind, and that meant the mind was something apart from the body. However, as Russell admits in 1928 without drawing the rational logical conclusion, "The philosopher (...) was not taken seriously, and science remained comfortably materialistic." Same as others at the time and even later, he would not realize that not everyone within the scientific community was "materialistic," with some theoretical physicists, by 1925 we would enter the modern quantum theory era, making actually a very strong case for intelligent design, on one hand, and for the origin of what we perceive as material being in a non-physical phenomenon, on the other, a non-physical phenomenon subdued by some of the members of highly advanced cosmic civilizations that have in contact with us for thousands of years. Some quantum physicists would make a scientific argument for the existence of the soul and for consciousness, the essential aspect of all life forms and the true creator of what we only perceive as a material world. 

Russell navigates at times aimlessly an extremely choppy sea of conflicting ideas, and not once does he mention consciousness. He works, in this instance, with what some had to say on the question of the existence of the soul: "physicists assure us that there is not such thing as matter, and psychologists assure us that there is no such thing as mind." And while under other circumstances (What I Believe, 1925) he would make the case that mental activity is all about chemicals and electrical impulses, he admits now that "there are, however, various difficulties in the way of reducing mental activity to physical activity." As you are going to see in A Time of Change, there is an explanation for how mental activity translates into physical activity, which happens to be a very interesting process the awareness of which is going to give one access to powers many out there did not know we posses, no thanks to our education system, the academia, or the institution of religion. Then within the same paragraph, he makes a stunning claim concerning our physical aspect: "What we can say, on the basis of physics itself, is that what we have hitherto called our body is really an elaborate scientific construction not corresponding to any physical reality." 

As shocking a claim as that may be, it is demonstrably true. It is hard to tell if he meant it this way or not, but this is the true meaning of the reality of intelligent design, reason why both creationists and evolutionists do not want design discussed in schools, colleges, and universities, with Russell being no fan of religion. He describes the human body as a work of science and not as a product of biblical or evolutionary miracles, at the same time realizing the process behind this science is associated with some non-physical reality. Once again, he was correct about that. However, Russell somehow concludes that "modern science gives no indication whatsoever of the existence of the soul or mind as an entity." Regarding this matter he was wrong. In his defense, at the time humankind was still in the middle of a dense dark age, one we are only now about to leave forever behind. 

It is obvious that same as other materialists, Russell was looking for empirical evidence, for something he could detect with the help of measuring devices that would have proved the existence of the soul. If they could only weigh the soul. Someone did try that, they found out the soul was weighing 21 grams, and then they found out that they were dead wrong about that. The soul and the spiritual in general is energy vibrating at much higher frequencies when compared to the frequencies of the material, frequencies that are inaccessible to our sensory and because of that to our current measuring devices. Energy does not have mass. As a result, a rational logical interpretation of what is observable, there is other kind of evidence attesting to the existence of an independent from the body soul. 

After analyzing almost 4,000 cases over four decades, that kind of rational interpretation of indisputable evidence led scientists with the University of Virginia to conclude reincarnation is real, the significance of their finding being the soul is something real. Then we have the new science of transpersonal psychology establishing that consciousness is, indeed, high frequency energy apart from the body. 

Had Russell lived for another decade or so, he would have become familiar with how computers work. Computers function based on the same principle everything else in the universe operates on, a principle that was out there from the moment the universe was born. Something acknowledged by many along the time, the human body is a perfect mirror of the universe. As a result, similar to the software making the hard drive into an operational computer, when at birth and not a moment earlier the soul is downloaded to our physical aspect, it turns the new human body into a human being. This is why what we really are is the immortal, the eternal soul energy within the body and not the ephemeral body.

Because he believes that what some call soul or mind is one with the body, and Einstein appeared to have a similar opinion, though as you are going to see, he was misunderstood, Russell is firmly convinced that "There can not be reason for supposing that either a piece of mind or a piece of matter is immortal." His reasoning is based on a number of false assumptions, such as the notion that "the most essential characteristic of mind is memory." The fact is, as most everyone knows today, mind and matter are two different kinds of energies, and what is most significant about that is that they are operating at different frequencies. He then argues that since basically everything related to memory is associated with the brain, another thing that, as you are going to see in A Time of Change is not true, since "this structure decays at death, there is every reason to suppose that memory also must cease." Again, the soul is energy, and the First Law of Thermodynamics states that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Energy is emanated from a source, and in the case of the soul, its energy was emanated from the Source all energy of everything there is in this and other universes has emanated from, a Source, a super-consciousness some call Prime Creator while others erroneously call God.

Like most materialists, Russell embraces the position that life is limited to whatever happens between birth and death, and that everything beyond that is completely inconsequential: "we shall have to admit that what is going to happen many millions of years hence has no very great emotional interest for us here and now." It actually does. Past present and future are part of the same space-time continuum, and even though we all live in the present, we are always persuaded in our choices of here and now by what us and humankind has experienced in the past and by what we envision regarding how our personal and the future of civilization Earth should look like.  

Not only that but everything we have experienced in the past and everything we experience in the present is in line with what we as spiritual entities must accomplish in the end within this lower world of the Natural Order of Creation. 

(Edited January 2, 2024)

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 




Monday, January 20, 2020

PANIS ANGELICUS: A CHURCH SONG DEDICATED TO A MADE UP STORY

All humans are inherently entitled to follow the path they choose to follow in their life. That said, to this day, in houses of worship they continue to read from books the people are told God himself, and that could not be further from the truth. The original Gnostic churches, on the other hand, were houses of learning, not of worship. When the institution of religion was created, its purpose was to disallow access to learning opportunities to a majority of the population of the planet. From the beginning, the church of religion became a place where the people were asked to worship human-like gods in the sky the priests claimed to be their representatives on Earth. That state of affairs had and still has a malefic effect on the development of civilization Earth, and since they were  indoctrinated with irrational religious belief from an early age, until recently the people would not know there is an alternative to that fictional reality.

You may have heard Panis Angelicus performed by Andrea Bocelli or Luciano Pavaroti, and there is a very good chance you liked it. Harmonious sound is pleasing to the senses, to the entire body, and because of that we at times do not pay attention to the message of the song, something that becomes infused in our subconscious when we not pay attention and take things for granted. To give an example, many singers give Leonard Cohen's song Hallelujah a very emotional religious interpretation. The lyrics, however, are a sarcastic reference to religious belief. If you are a religious person, you may have also liked this Panis Angelicus, and yet most likely you did not know the story behind the story it tells. 

The song is the last stanza of a hymn 
called Sacris solemniis written in the 13th century by Thomas Aquinas, they hold him to be a saint yet no one knows why, dedicated to the feast of Corpus Christi, the Solemnity of the Holy Body and Blood of Christ. As if that was not creepy enough, the title of the song translates by Bread of Angels, and while its lyrics do not directly state the bread is the body of Christ, they imply it, an obvious reference to the passage in the Bible known as the last supper. There, the apostles are told the bread on the table is the body of Jesus and the wine in the cup is Jesus' blood. Again, pretty creepy if you think about it, but this is what the text says and this is what they preach in churches. As a consequence of that this is what many people indoctrinated with church dogma from a time in their life when they could not tell true from false believe. They even have a little waffle so they could experience every Sunday the chewing and the digesting of the body of Christ, and then they are given a small cup of red wine representing blood, so that in there manipulated imagination they drink Jesus' blood.

What most churchgoers are not aware of for they were never told the real story, is that the ritual that in church Christianity is known as Eucharist is based on two non-Christian traditions that have nothing in common with the life of the one known under the name of Jesus. 
At the time the non-Christian Christian church was emerging its founders were known as the Adversaries, as in the adversaries of the true Christology promoted at the original secular Christian school of thought. In line with that they were also adversaries of Jesus' anti-religion message. 

In those days, the masses were celebrating Goddess Ceres, the patron of agriculture, by making and eating bread cakes that represented the "body of the goddess." They were also celebrating God Dionysus by drinking wine that supposedly was "the blood of the god." Church Christianity came up with a better one, a fantasy story meant to bring Dionysus and Ceres worshipers under its monopolistic tent. That was to give the bishops of the church more political power while at the same time enabling them to make substantial financial gains. 

A constant craving for money and power is the defining aspect of the entire history of the church and of profiteers of religion in general all the way to today's multi-millionaire evangelists. Something else churchgoers are not aware of, the initial basis for this non-Christian church Eucharist was the another fabricated story, the one about Jesus dying on the cross for our sins. As you are going to see, we find evidence across the cultural spectrum of Middle East and Far East, India and Tibet in particular, none of that happen, and even today's Bibles acknowledge in some left unedited passages that Jesus was of a relative old age when he was debating the Pharisees. The very claim that God gave his one and only son to death to save the world is based on a Jewish tradition much older than the time of Jesus. Most importantly, as you are going to see, it makes absolutely no sense.

The last supper story is a made up story, and this made up story is what the harmonious, the pleasing to our senses Panes Angelicus hymn is based on. It was meant as a way of incorporating in church dogma traditions associated with older religions at the time when the bishops were seeking to establish a monopoly on the business of religion and this way make church Christianity the one and only religion in the empire. In fact, as you are going to see in A Time of Change, there is absolutely nothing genuinely Christian in curch Christianity, or true for that matter.

(Last edit: January 2, 2024)

* * *

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 


A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public free of charge. You can only share it with others free of charge. 
Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 


Thursday, December 12, 2019

SOPHIA AND THE CHURCH OF THE DARK AGE


During the editing process, on occasion I would remove text that while interesting, I found it to represent a diversion from the topic at hand, this way disrupting the flow of the argument. This was the case with the story about the St. Sophia Church in Istanbul, Turkey. What follows is no longer part of the manuscript. To the original and now excised from the book discussion I added here context that clarifies certain points made in the book about the institution of religion under different circumstances.

&.

The word philosophy comes from the Greek philo sophia, meaning love of wisdom. A rather strange fact considering that same as in the case of Orthodox Judaism, based on the story of Adam and Eve in the Bible and the Torah in the Christian religion too knowledge is associated with the otherwise made-up notion of capital sin, one of the most impressive Christian churches ever was Saint Sophia. Also known as the Great Church, or the Church of the Divine Wisdom, it was built in Constantinople, Byzantium, today's Istanbul, Turkey, between 532 and 537 CE. Numerous fires and earthquakes have repeatedly destroyed it along the time. It was rebuilt, destroyed again, rebuilt again, and eventually it changed owners. Today, that church is known as Hagia Sophia.

The history of this coveted monumental construction mirrors in many ways the history of humans on this planet once religious institutions took over their communities. From that moment on their life would be marred by thousands of years of religious wars, with many of those wars still going on today. In line with that when the Christian church came to prominence after a group known as the Adversaries seceded from the secular original Christian school of thought to create a new religious institution with the intent of establishing a monopoly on the business of religion, communities across the Middle East and Europe would be terrorized by the constant infighting between different Christian sects and by the violence perpetrated by the so-called Universal Church on competing religions and on secular schools of thought. 

The history of the demise and the reinstatement of power under new authority of the St. Sophia Church is also a reflection of the fact that from the beginning those claiming to be intercessors of God were actually using the institution of religion to facilitate the mental and physical enslavement of Earth-humans by the Custodial authorities, the entities that at one time took over by force an experiment known in some circles as Project Earth. The priests were calling themselves "intercessors of God," and they still do, when in reality this God was the chief archon, the very human leader of a group of non-terrestrial colonists. In other words, they were the Custodial authorities' henchmen.

After the fall of Constantinople in 1453, in the spirit of Muhammad’s all-inclusive Constitution of Medina, contrary to popular belief the conquering Muslims did not suppress Christianity or the Christian people. They allowed them to not just exist but thrive in the city. Eventually, more radical leaders would take over this supposedly Christian church and made it into a mosque. In 1928, an amendment to the Turkish Constitution was establishing now that Islam was no longer a state religion, and by 1937, Turkey become officially a secular state. At that time the old St. Sophia Christian church turned the Blue Mosque was transformed into a museum. 

Sophia is a character associated with the Gnostic Christian mysteries, a symbol of enlightenment highly respected by all the great minds of the ancient world. The church, however, has always labeled the Gnostics heretics, their teachings were and are still considered heresies, and yet via an association with the Essenes' teachings, plus the education Jesus had received in the Far East, Persia, and Egypt, Jesus, Paul, and Mary Magdalene too were of a Gnostic persuasion, nothing to do with church Christianity. This is how we know that the Gnostics and the Cathari, not the Christian church, were the ones preserving Jesus, Paul, and Mary's legacy. 

Within the Gnostic community Sophia was a revered symbol for divine wisdom. Equally significant, at a time when the Christian Trinity included a feminine entity, she was the second attribute of the Holy Trinity. Last but certainly not the least Sophia was the other name given to Christ by certain 4th century theologians. 

According to these theologians, Sophia and Christ were one and the same, a feminine-masculine spiritual emanation from the source some erroneously call God. This would have been very much like and most likely inspired by the ancient Chinese concept of Yin and Yang describing separate yet complementary masculine and feminine, positive and negative energies. The Gnostic point of view was this feminine-masculine Sophia-Christ entity was associated with the notion of shared knowledge and wisdom by divine beings, by people from the sky, as well as by the source itself. According to them too, Earth people were constantly receiving knowledge from the source, from IT. In his authentic letters Paul makes references to this fact and more than once (this is still part of A Time of Change and you will find it explained there in detail), with something similar being stated in the Quran. 

As a result, as a mythical character the Sophia/Christ entity was related to the bringers of light and to the members of the genuine Brotherhood of the Serpent, a group of non-terrestrial beings that contrary to the agenda adopted by the Custodial authorities that gave us the institutions of religion and slavery were here helping Earth-humans build their own advanced civilization. The Custodial authorities where trying to prevent that from happening so they could continue to use the population of the planet as slaves. This is why the Bible condones and endorses slavery from the first book of the Old Testament to the last of the forged texts, the ones attached at the end of the New Testament. 

To confuse the masses about the positive role this entity was playing in their life according to Gnostic traditions, in the Adam and Eve story of the Bible and the Torah, not  in its Quran version, which by and large is a different Adam and Eve story, one rich in enlightening esoteric knowledge, that too analyzed in the book, Sophia/Christ becomes now the character called Eve. Precisely because same as Jesus, Sophia, now Eve, was on a mission to awaken the Earth-human consciousness' from the sleep the Custodial authorities put it to, Jewish scribes and later church people would malign her. A consequence of that, for two thousand years now, even though in reality Eve was a symbol for spiritual awakening, based on the fabricated story in the Torah and the Bible, women all over the planet have been considered evil and were treated as second class citizens. 

She supposedly commits a grave sin when together with the serpent, a symbol of the Brotherhood of the Serpent, among others, and of transfer of information from the source of everything to Earth people, encourages Adam, as in humankind, to disobey Genesis God’s orders and feed on the fruits of the tree of knowledge. From now own the masses were to perceive Eve/Sophia, women in general and a serpent representing the ones generously sharing a special knowledge with Earth-humans as wrongdoers that dared to defy a God that wanted man to remain poor in spirit. This God of love, as described in churches, supposedly punishes humans with a debilitating eternal curse, which was a story created by priests seeking to make people obey them considering they claimed to be the intercessors of that vengeful God. In essence, in order to make Earth-humans stay away from knowledge so they could be easily manipulated and controlled, according to both the Torah and the Bible this God conveniently punishes not just Adam and Eve but the entire humankind. 

Based on what was revealed through the mysteries, which contained coded information only the initiated had accessed to, mysteries often referenced by a Jesus and by a Paul who in reality were teaching against religion, every time it incarnates a new human body the soul’s mission is to ascend to a higher level of enlightenment so it could become reunited with its source. The soul reaches that state by seeking the company of “Sophia,” of wisdom. Helped by benevolent non-terrestrial non-supernatural entities to fulfill its mission, wisdom is something the Earth-human’s spirit must find though on its own, by processing gnosis, knowledge it also uncovers while experiencing the earth plane. 

Once the so-called Universal Church took over the reins of power in a now disintegrating Roman Empire, the bishops would denigrate in the eyes of the masses the authentic non-religious Christian movement and almost completely silenced the voice of the Gnostic Christians by burning their books and their savants. Suddenly, Sophia, who same as Christ was a symbol for spiritual enlightenment was to be viewed now as something evil the Christian God had cursed, the Eve that tricked poor Adam into committing the greatest sin ever, the sin of seeking knowledge. As attested in no other than the Bible, though, seeking the liberating knowledge happens to be precisely what Jesus is urging his followers to do, with that being only one of the many instances when Jesus and the institution of religion are in opposition. 

The effect that absurd rule imposed in houses of worship had on the people's psyche was that their natural inclination toward seeking the hidden truth and conquering the vast unknown was diminished, when not completely disrupted.That deliberately induced mentality was what threw humankind into a prolonged Dark Age. Many among the planet's population would not even be aware of that, with the Dark Age being something they only now begin to truly extract themselves mentally from, but they have been living according to a false perception of reality for most of their entire life.

(Edited August 31, 2023)

* * *

A Time of Change is private intellectual property made available to the public in this format free of charge. You could only share it free of charge. 

Copyright laws prohibit the unauthorized commercial reproduction of the entire set of documents or any part of it. 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 1 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 2 OF 3 

A TIME OF CHANGE - VOLUME 3 OF 3 


ATmeOfChangePG@gmail.com