“Know we do not have many of the answers you were told we have, and that many of the answers provided in schools, universities, and in houses of worship are deliberate distortions of a reality kept hidden from the Earth-human for thousands of years now. Seek the liberating truth.”
- A Time of Change, Volume 2
“The universe operates at the frequency of honesty and truth. Earth-humans live according to a false perception of reality, and this is no accident.” The first sentence of the book pretty much defines what this ample project is about.
Our civilization has been afflicted with disharmony for as long as history books could recall. Earth people waging war after war against fellow man and Mother Nature, a global community extremely divided, outrageous economic discrepancies and an artificial class stratification, all that did not just happen. Indeed, this is not the natural order of things, and it does not have to be the way it is in perpetuity.
For thousands of years now humankind has been living according to a false perception of reality, and that too is no accident. To generate change that benefits the greater good, Earth-humans must break free from the constraints of a manufactured illusion they were trapped in with the help of the current existential system. To that end, the Earth-humans must make a rational, non-impulsive effort to change the current system. Among others, they will have to figure out how we as a civilization ended up where we are today, and reconnect with their true origin, true nature, and the real purpose of being here.
A certain somebody once reminded the world a certain truth was bound to set everyone free. A Time of Change is an open invitation to all the people of the planet to acknowledge layer after layer of liberating truth they have been deprived access to for a long time now. Then the world will not just look different. It will be different.
- A Time of Change, Opening Statement
“You must do something to make the world more beautiful.” – Miss Rumphius
The result of 15 years of researching, analyzing, and reinterpreting well-known and less known science, religion, history, and spirituality related facts, A Time of Change is a three-volume book of shocking revelations about the true origin of our civilization and the reason why humankind is in the state it is today. You have free access here to the unedited version of the manuscript of the book.
Volume 1 was released on April 21, 2021. Material was added later, with the new completion date being now July 7, 2021. Volume 2 was released on July 15, 2021. Still a work in progress, Volume 3 will be made public on 02.22.2022.
The future of this book project is yet to be decided. There is always the possibility of a print edition. More about the project and the author in A Book’s Journey, A Time of Change, Volume 1- An Abstract and some of the other articles below.
A Time of Change is private intellectual property intended as cognitive support for civilization advancement. Copyrights laws apply. Reproduction of the entire document or of portions of it for commercial purpose is prohibited. If proper crediting is accompanied by a live link to this website, monetized Internet sites can post excerpts from the text.
Friday, March 5, 2021
ON SLAVERY: THE UNTOLD BLACK AND WHITE HISTORY OF EARLY AMERICA (An Excerpt; The March 5, 2021 Version)
Originally published on June 6, 2020. Revised on March 5, 2021
"Not for a moment minimizing the significance of an institution of slavery that has been part of the economic system for thousands of years now all over the planet, one other significant fact overlooked by black ministers, black politicians, and by white politicians fighting racism during the electoral campaign yet never before or after that, not only that free blacks too owned black slaves, white slave owners were actually a minority among the white colonists. According to existing records, a majority among the white population of the pre and the post-Independence War did not owe slaves. An 1860 census shows that the year before the Civil War started even in the states of the Lower South and the Middle South, the first ones to secede from the Union, only 30.5% of the population owned slaves while in the Border States slave-ownership was even lower: 15.9%. This should give those who indiscriminately vilify today the entire white population of the country for what only a few would have been responsible of some two hundred years ago reason to revise their attitude. There is plenty of blame to go around, more so when slavery was and still is condoned in the holy books of our religious institutions, and when, once again, free blacks and Native Americans too were slave owners.
In addition to that historians do not dispute the fact that blacks have joined the anti-abolition Confederate State Army fighting the abolitionist North. The only thing they are debating over is the actual number that have enrolled and if they did that voluntarily or not.
As seen, blacks had already fought in great numbers against the American Patriots during the 1776 Revolutionary War, when the British shrewdly promised them the freedom the colonies were not yet ready to grant, and the same is true of the Native American tribes. In the battle of the Great Bridge near Norfolk, December of 1775, the war would officially start when the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776 but the revolution was already a fact in Massachusetts and Virginia as early as April of 1775, black slaves volunteered to form what is known as the Ethiopian Regiment. They were fighting against revolutionary Virginians on the side of the former British governor of Virginia, John Murray, 4th Earl of Dunmore, and of the loyalists behind him.
When Thomas Jefferson became the governor of Virginia (1779-1781), he invited free blacks to enlist with the local militias, but it is unclear if any of them responded to that. At the same time, in the north, after slaves were promised freedom if they served in the Continental Army, about one-fifth of the Army was now black.
According to Gordon Wood (Friends Divided), during the Revolutionary War a minimum of twenty thousand black slaves fought on the side of the British, between 100,000 to 150,000 according to Thomas Jefferson, and if you ever visit Valley Forge in Pennsylvania, you will find there a sign reminding everyone that the Native American tribes too took the British side. Blacks would also enroll with the British troops during the 1812 war, when they once again fell for the promise of freedom made by the leaders of the red coats. The war of 1812 lasted three years, and it was during this war that the British destroyed most of the White House by setting it on fire. Its allies, the Native tribes in the north would massacre innocent, unarmed American citizens who had been promised safe passage to the colonies south of the border with Canada.
Black slaves’ fighting on the side of the British against America during the 1812 war is the reason why the third and today no longer used stanza of the American national anthem reads (my emphasis),
Thursday, February 18, 2021
"In his 1989 book The Selfish Gene, Atheist evolutionist Richard Dawkins proclaims that, “Our brains are separate and independent enough from our genes to rebel against them.” He sounds so knowledgeable and convincing that admirers hold this quote to be a gem of Dawkins superior thinking and lifetime dedication to promoting the greatness of the theory of evolution. However, the only thing emblematic for his lifetime input into the public conversation on evolution is that nothing in that statement is true, and that same as in many other instances, the ordinary people would not know it.
A rebellious brain having a mind of its own is Dawkins’ way of implying that the brain is the one that makes decisions, not our spirit/soul. This reductionist intellectualist assumption defies common sense and has no support in genetics, according to data made available in Genes, Brain and Behavior, a medical journal published by the International Behavioral and Neural Society. The other message in his statement is brains and genes are never on the same page, they are “separate and independent” of each other, says the millionaire master of misinformation who sells pseudo-science to the trusting masses. According to the National Institute of Neural Disorders and Stroke, “At least a third of the approximately 20,000 different genes that make up the human genome are active (expressed) primarily in the brain. This is the highest proportion of genes expressed in any part of the body. These genes influence the development and function of the brain, and ultimately control how we move, think, feel, and behave.” (Brain Basics, Genes at Work in the Brain)
Indeed, you could not be more disconnect from scientific fact and reason than Richard Dawkins is. Genuine science contradicts most everything this media glorified, this darling of the academia 12-book-published multi-millionaire evolutionist claims with confidence in front of unsuspecting audiences. He would not act on his own, though.
When one repeatedly makes false claims in public, sooner or later the people are going to catch on to that and things will inevitably get embarrassing for both perpetrator and his enablers. Seven years after he wrote that “Our brains are separate and independent enough from our genes to rebel against them,” in yet another Dawkins best-selling book derided by the non-affiliated segment of the scientific community, something he titled The God Delusion, he claims now, also without producing any proof, that matter and living things preceded intelligence, meaning intelligence has appeared later during the process of life development on this planet.
In the end, and there will be more in the pages ahead on Dawkins’ bizarre, when not irrational, more often than not incoherent input into the debate, the badge-of-honor quote from The Selfish Gene turns out to be an emblem for the state of confusion and lack of honesty when it comes to the theory of evolution characterizing a Darwinist community he would represent. Just in case anyone wonders, church creationists do not earn any points on account of his failures."
Thursday, February 4, 2021
We were once told, "the truth will set you free." So, do not act offended by the truth. You deprive yourself from an opportunity to become free of a false perception of reality you were deliberately trapped into from the moment you were born. After all, this is a time of change.
Something no trusting churchgoer is aware of, when certain Christian churches proclaim their love of Jesus and claim their institution and the Christian religion is a product of what Jesus taught, they are inviting everyone to worship a falsification of who Jesus was and what he stood for. So how did the bishops come up with the notion that Jesus’ death on the cross wiped clean the sin slate for everyone for generations to come?
To begin with, it is worth repeating it, Jesus did not die on the cross and we have the evidence to prove it. For hundreds of years now the people have been told this was what happened and since believing is easy, they believed that. As seen, though, their new so-called universal religion had very little literature to work with and basically no church Christianity traditions. In order to attract to their store of dangerously addictive illusions and false hope a larger segment of the market of believers, as seen here in detail, the early church bishops would take entire books, as well as holidays, rituals, and symbols that belonged to other religions, made them into something other than what they originally were and then put the label Christian on them. This was precisely what also happened in the case of the story about Jesus alleged death on the cross for our sins.
In Leviticus 16:15 we are told that, “Aaron must slaughter the first goat as a sin offering for the people...” As seen earlier, this was done to celebrate the time when their god allegedly killed the Egyptian firstborn male children and the firstborn among their animals in order to free the Jewish people from slavery. Exodus being a fantasy story with no historicity to it aside, the sins of the Israelites and the uncleanness of the Sanctuary were somehow transferred unto the goat. The priest would then kill the goat and the blood spilled was supposedly giving the person who had paid for the goat a clean conscience for another year or so. This way he was escaping the haunting shadow of his guilt, with this ridiculous ritual being the origin of the word scapegoat. Again, nothing makes sense, but that is religion for you. When in Leviticus 16:21 we are introduced though to the entire process, things get extremely hilarious.
On the Day of Atonement, the priest takes the goat to the altar where he would “lay both hands on the head of the live goat and confess over it all the wickedness and rebellion of the Israelites – all their sins – and put them on the goat’s head.” Imagine the priest dressed in ceremonial garb talking to a goat and telling the poor soul, listen, we humans did some bad things, and guess what, you are going to pay for that. You are going to die so we atone. Would you buy that if you were the goat? Once again, though, killing goats to atone for one’s sins was good business for the priests. The Christian bishops, however, decided to lower the bar of rationalism even more and replaced the goat with Jesus, the alleged son of god. So, don’t blame the Monty Python people for making fun of religion in general and of Christianity in particular. It certainly had it coming.
By replacing the goat with son-of-god-Jesus and by making him the sacrificial lamb that allegedly dies to pay for everyone else’s bad behavior, the founders of the Christian religion were killing actually three goats with one stone. First, they were offering the paying customer a more dramatic, more impressive story, and because of that supposedly a more convincing religion. In the process, they would confuse everyone about the real symbolism behind crucifixion. The third and the most malefic accomplishment of all was, with the help of this made-up story they were able to falsify Jesus’ true mission and message.
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
What we perceive as reality is the consequence of a process triggered in the realm of extra-sensory at the subconscious level of our being. Nothing exists before we observe our creation. Nothing truly exists outside our inner being either. The world is a collective holographic projection of many individual thoughts, a reflection of our understanding of what we observe, an understanding instantaneously manifested as reality. This is the result of our spirit energy being connected to all spirit energy in a dimension of the spiritual known as the collective subconscious.
Everything of the so-called material, life forms included, is made of the same elementary energy units. Everything perceived as being of the material is by and large made of electrons, protons, and neutrons. The quark, the smallest element of all is considered the fundamental constituent of matter. It was not directly observed but its existence was predicted based on experiment. Quarks too are charged electrical, scientists say.
Trees, fishes, plants or humans, everything is made of the same fundamental constituents, and everything is energy. The difference is in the way those fundamental energetic constituents are arranged, and how they end up in combinations that are specific to every material form is the key to solving the mystery of the origin of everything perceived as material, life forms included.
Both the body and the spirit/soul of a living organism are forms of energy. The spirit is high- frequency energy. The soul is spirit energy temporarily trapped in the material vibrating at a lower frequency than the spirit energy does. The material body is low frequency energy, with every one of its organs having its specific frequency.
Nothing comes out of real nothing. According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy could not be created in terms of the total energy that makes our universe, and yet all energy must have a source. The same law says no energy is ever destroyed, as in lost, meaning in its particular ways our spirit/soul energy too is eternal. In a good number of Edgar Cayce readings, the “Creator,” the “Maker” is described as being a “God-force,” or “the Creative Force called God.” This is not the personal god of religion, with force being a synonym for powerful energy, an energy that at the instigation of religious institutions the Earth people call God. That means what the term god actually stands for is something other than what people in houses of worship are made to believe it does.
Similar to what we find in Maya traditions, some of the Cayce readings reveal that what Earth people call god is actually an incandescent source emanating an infinite of super-fine information carrying energy fields. This source is endowed with what could be described as super-consciousness, and under favorable pre-established, as in programmed circumstances, the coded information carried by these energies manifests as an illusion, as complex holographic images of material forms, life forms included. This is actually how all universes come to be, and one hundred years ago, Max Planck, the German theoretical physicists who in 1918 was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics for discovering the energy quanta stated that “All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.”
The key to understanding the phenomenon called life is the realization that everything material is information carrying energy vibrating at its specific frequency, energy and information emanated from a source that does not talk, think, speak or write books. That source and the way IT operates was intentionally misrepresented in religion, where IT is now a miracle-producing he-god with fictitious supernatural powers and a knack for killing the enemies of his worldly ambitions or people he simply does not like. Despite what genuine science reveals, the materialist scientist claims that only what we could detect with the help of our five senses exists and has labeled the spiritual and IT-the-Source a superstition associated with the occult. The Mayans, on the other hand, are on record acknowledging that, similar to what we were told in this and other Cayce readings, the human-like gods and the sacred animals of their traditions are symbols, metaphors for astral and telluric energies and for the laws that govern the earth plane and the universe.
Information carried by the life energy during an initial process governed by the principles referred to in The Book of Manu generates what we perceive as living material forms, animal or plant. This is all part of a much larger picture, of a complex existential mechanism conceived in realms of reality we are not able to access at this time but are not inaccessible to us. The necessary elements that make the biosphere of our planet function the way it does are not here by chance, and the system as a whole did not put itself together randomly. In the beginning the input of information is of the natural. Later on, the process can be and is often replicated by highly advanced intelligent beings, something Earth people too will be able to do one day. Or, as Max Planck explained the logic behind reaching this conclusion, “We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.”
The two or three-dimensional images projected on our computer screen are made of little dots called pixels. The so-called material is made of tiny specs called quanta. Things are because cosmic consciousness energy originating outside the material universe entices those pixels and quanta to arrange according to the pattern encrypted in the information carrying energies emanated from the source or created by a non-supernatural entity capable of replicating that. This was perceived by the Earth people of the old as being an act by a creator god with supernatural powers, then someone took advantage of that and created religious institutions to use the Earth people’s induced inclination toward believing things to his advantage.
Is it truly possible that one super-evolved human could acquire the knowledge and develop the skills that would give him or her the ability to create amorphous and life forms out of an apparent nothing? To begin with, there is no such thing as nothing. As seen, everything is energy and information, and these days we are looking at pretty amazing virtual reality games and holographic imagery created by program designers getting better and better at what they do. Considering the progress we have made in the last six decades as a civilization regarding our comprehension of what reality is and how reality is produced and works, including the fact that our consciousness plays a central role in this process, that we can build now digital devices that one hundred years ago would have made us look like gods with supernatural powers in the eyes of the early inhabitants of a life-sustaining planet somewhere in this or other universes, we are definitely looking at a rational logical possibility.
Searching for the answer to the question of who or what has created the universe and man is an exciting challenge to take on. Many were told, and they believed it, that the Bible god did the whole thing in six days by snapping his divine fingers. Others were convinced by individuals with a degree in science that everything we see around us on the planet and up in the sky is a product of chance, of random acts of adaptation in the case of the members of the animal kingdom, and that the universe is the result of a huge explosion. They would be surprised to know that nowhere in the Book of Genesis are we told how god made the universe or why, and that many scientists are not so sure the Big Bang theory accurately describes the beginnings, and most importantly the origin of the universe. As a result, we must keep a wide-open mind as we continue to look for answers we actually do not have yet.
Thursday, December 10, 2020
Of a religious, political, or any other nature, humans taking sides in a debate that turned into a dispute accept as true by default every single claim made by the members of their adopted community. Also by default, they cry "False!" about everything stated by an opposition they were made to see as being the enemy. The mentality is, we are always right and the others are always wrong. To the unattached observer things look though the way they actually are. Each side is sometimes wrong and sometimes right, with neither one being willing to honestly acknowledge true for being true and false for being false when that does not serve its agenda.
In line with this reality not everything stated by a human universally accepted as being an evil person is false, and not everything ever written or claimed by someone whose knowledge and judgement society has come to admire is true and logical. Let us take, for example, the case of British philosopher Bertrand Russell when it comes to his opinion on immortality and soul.
The go to source is What Is the Soul?, a piece he apparently originally wrote in 1928. There is an 1947 and a 1957 version of it, and while he made a number of stylistic and terminology related adjustments, one thing these three versions have in common is him being wrong about mind/soul and physical body being one and the same thing.
In the 1928 version, right from the beginning Russell admits that, "When I was young we all knew, or thought we knew, that a man consists of a soul and a body." What happened next apparently unbeknownst to him too, an extremely reductionist materialist segment of the scientific community has hijacked the conversation, something supposedly done under the guise of addressing the false claims made in religion about the immortality of the body.
'The rising of the dead' still preached in many churches implies currently dead human beings will one day rise in spirit and body from their grave, the other implication being the soul and the body are one. In essence, the position taken by materialist scientists and church theologians is very similar. The only difference consists in the stories they tell, respectively, based on what both erroneously describe as being fact.
The way empiricists have found it fit to address this nonsense was by assuming that either such a thing as soul does not exist, or that since the soul and the body are one, when the body decomposes after our passing, so does the soul. In reality, the immortality of the soul and the false immortality of the body preached by some religious institutions are two different notions materialists decided to treat as one and the same thing.
As demonstrated in A Time of Change, not only that materialists and theologians are wrong, the fact that both of them directly or indirectly deny the separation of the soul from the body and the immortality of the soul is no accident. As a way of controlling the people of the planet, this coordinated misrepresentation of the nature of being human as part of a scheme meant to hide from them their true origin and potential has generated a false perception of reality. This false perception of reality determines the way we live on this planet, the consequence of it being the state of constant crisis humankind have been experiencing for thousands of years.
With the advent of the quantum physics, many scientists would conclude now material reality is not really material, or real, and that what we perceive as material is the product of a mind over matter phenomenon. As a result, philosophers relying heavily on good science were of the opinion that, in a sense, the body too was a product of the mind, and that meant the mind was, indeed, something apart from the body. However, as Russell writes in 1928, "The philosopher (...) was not taken seriously, and science remained comfortably materialistic." What same as others at the time and even later on he did not realize was that not everyone within the scientific community was "materialistic," with some theoretical physicists making actually a very strong case for Intelligent Design, on one hand, and, on the other, for the origin of what we perceive as material being in a non-physical phenomenon. Some quantum physicists would also make the case for the existence of the soul and for consciousness, the essential aspect of all life forms being the true creator of what we only perceive as a material world.
Bertrand Russell navigates at times aimlessly within what seems to be an extremely choppy sea of conflicting ideas, and not once does he mention consciousness. He works, in this instance, with what others had to say on the question of the existence of the soul: "physicists assure us that there is not such thing as matter, and psychologists assure us that there is no such thing as mind." Even though under other circumstances (What I Believe, 1925) he would make the case that mental activity is all about chemicals and electrical impulses, at this moment he admits that "there are, however, various difficulties in the way of reducing mental activity to physical activity." Then within the same paragraph, he makes a stunning admission concerning our physical aspect: "What we can say, on the basis of physics itself [he probably meant to say 'on the basis of science'], is that what we have hitherto called our body is really an elaborate scientific construction not corresponding to any physical reality."
That happens to be true. This is also a statement in support of the notion of Intelligent Design, and yet Russell was no fan of religion. As we can see, though, he describes the human body as being a work of science and not a product of supernatural miracles.
Russell somehow concludes that "modern science gives no indication whatsoever of the existence of the soul or mind as an entity." First, it is obvious that same as other materialists, Russell was looking for empirical evidence, for something he could detect with the help of measuring devices. The soul and the spiritual in general, however, is energy vibrating at much higher frequencies when compared to the frequencies of the material, frequencies that are inaccessible to our sensory. As a result, for now one has to look for evidence in a rational logical interpretation of what is observable.
That kind of interpretation of the existing evidence led scientists with the University of Virginia, for example, to conclude after analyzing almost 4,000 cases over four decades now that reincarnation is real, meaning the soul is real. Then we have the new science of transpersonal psychology establishing that consciousness is, indeed, high frequency energy apart from the body.
Had Russell lived another decade, he would have become familiar with how computers work. Computers function based on the same principle everything else in the universe operates on, a principle that was out there from the instance the universe was born. Something acknowledged by many along the time, the human body is a perfect mirror of the universe. As a result, similar to the software making the hard drive into an operational computer, when the soul is downloaded to the physical aspect of a human at birth, it turns the new human body into a human being. This is why what we really are is the spirit within the body and not the body itself.
Because he believes that what some call soul or mind is one with the body, Russell is firmly convinced "There can not be reason for supposing that either a piece of mind or a piece of matter is immortal." His reasoning is based though on false assumptions, such as the notion that "the most essential characteristic of mind is memory." He then argues that since basically everything related to memory is associated with the brain, something that, as you are going to see in A Time of Change is totally false, and since "this structure decays at death, there is every reason to suppose that memory also must cease."
Apparently, unlike Albert Einstein who was an admirer and a student of her writings, Russell was unaware of what a contemporary by the name of Helena Blavatsky, an erudite philosopher some would disparagingly and conveniently describe as being an "occultist" was stating in reference to the Akashic Record. The existence of the Akashic Record or the Akashic Field has been acknowledged for thousands of years, and in recent times books on science and the Akashic Field by eminent philosophers of science were made available to the large public to read and draw its own conclusions. This field contains the memory of everything that ever happened in the universe, including the memory of what every single soul has experienced during its many life cycles in the earth plane. The soul is connected to the record at the subconscious level all the time, as it was proven to us by individuals like Edgar Cayce there are ways of gaining access to it, and, as a result, not only is the spirit energy aspect of the human immortal, it never loses the memory of everything it has experienced during its many lives.
In the end, like most materialists, Bertrand Russell embraces the position that life is limited to whatever happens between birth and death, and that everything beyond that is completely inconsequential to us: "we shall have to admit that what is going to happen many millions of years hence has no very great emotional interest for us here and now." As many of us know by now, according to illustrious scientists like Einstein and to field theory-based common sense, past, present, and future is one and the same continuum sequence of events. Because of that everything we have experienced in the past and everything expected of us to accomplish in the future is of great consequence for how we live our personal and the collective here in now moments.
A Time of Change is an unusual book of knowledge. It took 15 years to complete and volume 1 will be released in 2021 under to be established circumstances. Look for announcements on this blog and on other locations on the Internet.
Sunday, November 15, 2020
"The academia leadership has put the label science on the theory of evolution despite the fact that no rational institutionalized religion-despising human being could state in good scientific faith molecular biologists have provided a single ounce of credible evidence in support of that. They also put natural selection in science books when in reality natural selection is a fictional character in a story that similar to the miracles of the six-day creation in the Bible is the account of something that does not happen in nature.
To unify masses of people that were beginning to awaken into the hidden for centuries liberating truth into one confused entity that would be as easy to manipulate as those divided by the way of more often than not antagonistic religious beliefs, someone else came up with the similarly irrational idea that it was okay to believe god created man by the way of gradual evolution. The intent was to make the public believe in their equally fact and rational logic defying miracle-depending ways both religion and gradual evolution have diligently addressed the question of the origin and the purpose of life. Then the people were made to believe these two otherwise truth-falsifying explanations were the best and most importantly the only choices they had.
That induced state of mind resulted in more disharmony and allowed for the perpetuation of a system that operates on social and economic inequality, forces people to compete against each other and generates constant global chaos. This is where we are today as a civilization."
A Time of Change, Volume 3
A work in progress; to be released in 2021-20212 under yet to be established circumstances.
Friday, August 21, 2020
So, what is this Project Steve anyway? Project Steve is a ruse created by diehard evolutionists to help them hide from the public the fact that the actual evidence is stacked against evolution, the actual reason why to this day they continue to refuse to accept the challenge issued in the text of the Scientific Dissent on Darwinism. In other words, their response to that invitation to having an honest debate on evolution in a public forum was a propaganda device meant to cover up for their inability to address the many problems with Darwin's theory.
Concocted by a group of scientists of dubious ethics and analytic abilities acting as if they were the supreme authority in the matter, Project Steve represents indisputable evidence evolutionists do not want to be put in a situation where they have to respond publicly to the pertinent criticism of Darwin’s theory issued by other scientists. To draw attention away from that, they decided that unlike in the case of the Dissent issued by Discovery Institute, only scientists named Steve or whose name was similar to Steve were allowed to sign under their proclamation.
This was the NCSE’s Project Steve response to the Scientific Dissent on Darwinism:
Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to “intelligent design,” to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation’s public schools. (Project Steve, ncse.com)
The first question one would need to ask NCSE is why call evolution fact when according to your Project Steve “there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution.” In other words, on what basis do they claim “there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred” when they admit scientists cannot even agree on how evolution works? For if you don’t know what “patterns and processes” are associated with evolution, common sense says when you state that “evolution occurred,” this is an assumption, not a scientific fact.
Secondly, if “the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry,” where is the common ancestor? Why one hundred and sixty years after Darwin published a book deceptively titled On the Origin of Species no one has figured out yet the identity of that alleged common ancestor? Contrary to what NCSE’s Project Steve claims, otherwise a well-known fact even among evolutionists, overwhelming scientific evidence leads to the conclusion that same as the six-day creation in the Bible, common ancestry is another unproven evolutionary assumption based on the assumption that biological gradualism, for which we have zero real evidence, is how we got our millions of species.
And how is natural selection “a major mechanism in its occurrence” when even the most vocal among the supporters of evolution had to admit natural selection is not a real player. Ironically, as you are going to see, no other than Project Steve’s patron, Stephen Jay Gould, made it very clear, before he would contradict himself, again, natural selection is a figment of an evolutionist’s imagination.
Then why is intelligent design “creationist pseudo-science” when one of the leading scientists making the case for design, Michael Behe, is a university professor, a molecular biologist who happens to be a declared rejector of creationism. In Darwin’s Black Box he builds a solid case for intelligent design with the help of an abundance of certified scientific data anyone could look at and analyze, and not once is he making references to something that could even remotely be construed as religion. Intelligent design is not religion because some religious leaders decided to use it, before they recanted on their argument, to make the case for a designer god. After all, for pure political reasons many churches have also decided these days to endorse evolution. Does that make evolution religion? It does not, and yet, since the pro-evolution argument is actually entirely based on belief, for many out there this is precisely what evolutionism is.
Last but not the least Project Steve statement says that to debate over the validity of the theory of evolution would be “pedagogically irresponsible.” According to NCSE, doubting Lady Evolution to her face in science class is bad manners and a scientific debate over the premises for the conclusions reached by Darwin would be “inappropriate.” Who knew Evolution was so thin-skinned, and that the only ones to be allowed to enter debates should be individuals that have similar opinions on the topic debated over? Of course, claiming criticism of evolution is "pedagogically irresponsible" and "inappropriate" was about evolutionists covering up for the many false claims made in support of evolution and about the academia disallowing dissenting voices to be heard in schools and universities in order to protect the status quo.
Their attitude is similar to religious cults forbidding an internal debate over the religious dogma. There is also a not so subtle threat of excommunication and of experiencing all sorts of dire consequences when found guilty of apostasy."
Saturday, August 15, 2020
"Theologians speak of a one and only mighty consciousness, their all-knowing god with supernatural powers, and conveniently forget the Bible says we were made in this god’s image. That means we too are endowed with high consciousness, and that we too have those “supernatural” powers. Pretending to be in opposition with each other, promoters of religious belief and positivist materialist scientists are collaborating actually in what is a global effort to keep Earth people unaware of their spiritual nature and this way of their true potential. Their other objective is to keep them in the dark about their true origin, and this reminds us of something else we find in the Bible that makes little to no sense.
When we pay close attention to the actual meaning of certain passages in the Adam and Eve story, it becomes obvious that by committing the so-called original sin when he fed on the fruits of the forbidden tree of the knowledge of good and evil, man experienced significant consciousness awareness growth and spiritual illumination, something known as enlightenment. To deflect attention from that, according to the version of the story in the Book of Genesis, as you are going to see this is not the only version we have, Adam and Eve become aware they are naked. As a result, from now on they would live with a sense of shame, says the Bible. God decides to expel them from his private garden, but before that happens, he does actually something very human: He handsaws garments for both of them to cover their nakedness. That little detail creates though the mother of all theological dilemmas.
The Bible says god created man in his image and, sure enough, the god of the Bible does act and speak like humans do. Theologians also claim god is aware of everything, and the question arising fluently from that is South Park funny: Since man and god were mirror images of each other, was the Genesis god aware of his nakedness? The Bible says nothing about that, but the logical answer could only be, yes, he was. He was naked and aware of it too.
No doubt about it, a god who looked like the man he created and behaved like flesh and blood males did, must have been as naked as Adam and Eve were and also as anatomically correct. However, while the implication is god was well aware of the fact that he was naked, the Bible does not say he was ashamed of that, as was the case with Adam and Eve. All in all, it appears the naturist movement, or nudism, might have gotten actually a much earlier start than previously thought. It is either that, or the story in the Bible is not true.
Picture if you could a naked human-like male god chitchatting with a naked Adam and a naked Eve under the trees of the Garden of Eden. As the Christian Right would describe that, decadence was at its peak in god’s kingdom, and Michelangelo came very close to depicting this biblical reality on the Sistine Chapel ceiling. In fact, he came a little too close to that for the hypocritical moral comfort of the church, and after his death, the church hired Daniele da Volterra to cover up some of the genitals. During the restoration work done in the 1980s, additions by other artists were removed, and yet the Volterra breeches, which is how his fig leaves and loincloths are known to the art aficionado, were left untouched. It appears the church did not like the fact that, pun intended, Michelangelo went by the book.
Then there is an additional doctrinal problem caused by this case of bad writing and editing in Genesis: Is being aware a godly quality, or a curse? In other words, is being aware a bad consequence of the original sin, as the Bible and the church dogma imply when it comes to Adam and Eve experiencing shame as a result of becoming aware of their nakedness, or is this something that makes us like gods, as one of the Genesis gods states: “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:22) The church cannot have it both ways, and yet it certainly went for that for almost two thousand years now."
Sunday, July 12, 2020
Part of a series of messages sent by friends in "high places" channeled in the late 1980's, we were told that, at the time, America was the most controlled society in the world, and that the visual media, television in general was extremely toxic for the people. Four decades later, the entire Earth collective is pretty much in the same situation, and you could see it coming.
Common sense says the planet must be under someone's supervision, or else we would live in a state of constant chaos. Somebody has to manage globally both resources and human activity, or else we would be eternally at war with each other over territory and other material possessions while recklessly squandering those otherwise finite resources of ours. Since obviously somebody does have some level of control, and they are getting better and better at that, are we to assume things could have been a lot worse than they are?
Who are those holding to, losing, or aspiring to have a tight grip on the controls? There is more than one group claiming to be on a mission to set us on the "right" course. Most likely, there is also more than one vision regarding what that course should be? No doubts about it, the people are guided and the Earth is protected by friends in high places. Other than that, we are responsible for most everything else, for the wars, the division, the famine, the ignorance and for our disregard for Mother Nature.
On the other hand, slavery was not our existential choice. As attested in the Bible, the Torah, the Quran and in Mahabharata, slavery is as old as civilization Earth is. Religion, political forms of government and money, these too are instruments of control and manipulation inserted into our experiment by individuals from outside our civilization. At one time they took control of this project, by force, and self-appointed themselves Custodial authorities, kings and queens supposedly descending directly from god. They would deliberately slow down civilization advancement by, among others, using the population of the planet as slave labor and its resources for personal gain. Their time is up, hence the turmoil over the planet.
A change of system means a change of status quo. This should reflect the progress we made with our collective understanding of the purpose of our being here. In order to prevent mass cognitive progress and awakening, which would make it impossible for them to control the population of the planet, certain entities insist on preserving an outdated status quo that does not correspond to the level of awakening experienced today by a significant segment of the population of the planet. To that end they create confusion, division, they frame the narrative on the opposite side of a rational logical interpretation of facts and mislead the population of the planet into living according to a false perception of reality.
Without realizing it, Earth people are constantly divided into all sorts of antagonistic groups. Democrat against Republican, creationist against evolutionist, Christian against Muslim, Christian against Jew, Jew against Muslim, black against white, this is meant to prevent the people of the world from acting united for the benefit of the greater good. If they did, they could no longer be controlled and manipulated the way they have been for thousands of years now. This, however, is about to change.
Considering the history of our civilization, a rational managerial system would be a merit-based one, with the best, as in the most knowledgeable and rational among the people of the planet appointing the best among them to organize and supervise civilization advancement. The people are currently controlled and manipulated with the help of political forms of government, democracy included. Artificially split into millions of "us" and "them," they are made to believe they have a saying when it comes to the administrating of their country and of the planet, and that they, not the others, are on the right side of history. In reality, their decision making process is corrupted by the way of a massive infusion of false information coming from all directions, be it government, party leaders, the media, houses of worship, schools, colleges, or universities.
The status quo established through the political system is in large part maintained with the help of the institution of religion. This is why the political has always worked hand in hand with houses of worship selling irrational belief and false hopes for a profit. It so happens the false hope and irrational belief generously administrated to trusting people in houses of worship is not much different from what most politicians have to offer on the campaign trail.
As history records show, from ancient times religion was recognized by the sage as being a precious tool in the hands of rulers seeking to control, subdue, and manipulate the masses to their advantage. According to Seneca the Younger (4 BCE-65 CE), "Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful." Even earlier than that, in the opinion of Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius (94 BCE-65 CE), "All religions are equally sublime to the ignorant, useful to the politician, and ridiculous to the philosopher." This is why the political, media organizations, and the education system have been covering up for or turned a blind eye to the reality behind the existence of the institution of religion and its practices for as long as we had political forms of government, media outlets, and an education system on this planet.
The education system is a significant element of the mechanism that facilitates mental and behavioral control of the population. This is why it is no accident that it fails to protect every new generation against indoctrination with irrational religious belief. More than that, schools, colleges, and universities indoctrinate their students, the future of our civilization, with a reductionist materialist-empiricist explanation of the nature of life and the purpose of humans experiencing the earth plane.
An act of deliberate deception, the academia promotes the evolution fallacy as fact and describes it as being the rational alternative to religious irrational offered by science. However, it is completely void of an otherwise essential acknowledgement of the spiritual, the defining aspect of life and everything else we perceive as reality. Therefore, without even referencing the many facts revealed in biology, genetics, or theoretical physics that prove bio-gradualism impossible in nature, same as in the case of creation according to religion, from that point of view alone the official explanation for the origin of humans on this planet is not just erroneous but provably a deliberate falsification of reality.
Combined with the effects of the genetic downgrading of the Earth-human performed thousands of years ago, the current system is meant to make sure there is no escaping from the manufactured illusion within the illusion of material reality the people have been tricked into embracing as real reality. This was the main reason why friends in high place have also told us,
“The Ultimate Tyranny in a society is not control by martial law. It is control by the psychological manipulation of consciousness, through which reality is defined so that those who exist within it do not even realize that they are in prison. They do not even realize that there is something outside of where they exist.” - Bringers of the Dawn
One of their messengers has once told the people of the world "the truth will make you free." Time for the people to awaken to a correct understanding of the true meaning of those words, and A Time of Change is going to be of help with that.
Progress must occur gradually, and it should be the result of a collective intellectual effort, not of the enlightenment of only a few. Society could not cope with an abrupt change of direction, and the consequences of a sudden collapse of the status quo could be dire for our civilization. That said we are now entering a unique astral conjuncture exerting strong positive influences on the planet and its population. As a result, ready or not, we are about to be put to the test by a conjuncture favoring the experiencing of paradigm change. We are individually and collectively in a state where any of us could take a leap forward, something never before seen in the history of our civilization. It may not look like that, but the commotion we observe today all over the planet is part of the process.
While counterintuitive in appearance and because of that confusing, what the world is experiencing these days is the complex result of a combination of interacting forces generating multiple, many a time conflicting sequences of cause and effect events meant to open the global community to embracing significant change. We are currently living the most intense mass manipulation effort, the most audacious attempt at "control by the psychological manipulation of consciousness" in the history of humankind, and this is not the doing of only one Master.
Will this organized existential nightmare end up as being a contribution to the greater good? Chaos, confusion and outrage is what they want to create, and chaos and uncertainty is what we have. This is the background on which changes planned a long time ago will be implemented. They are supposed to harmonize with a rational logical progression established by the way of natural law while the old status quo, the normal, will never be normal again.
Tuesday, May 26, 2020
"It Is Destined To Happen This Way" (Video) - THEY ARE LOOSING CONTROL OVER OUR CIVILIZATION. IS THIS FOR THE GREATER GOOD?
Sunday, May 17, 2020
CAPITALISM AND INSTITUTIONALIZED RELIGION: A TRUE STORY (An Excerpt from A TIME OF CHANGE, Volume 1, Chapter 4)
"No doubt about it, slavery, an institution condoned all over the Bible was the foundation for the capitalist system. The current engine of the system is capital issued by financial institutions in the form of worthless banknotes assigned a fictitious value. Even if the notes were backed by gold, and that is something no one could be sure of, they would still be nothing but a piece of special paper since you do not have access to the gold the value of the money supposedly derives from. True fact, according to ourworldindata.org the population of the planet has almost doubled since 1975. That means the monetary system had to come up with at least double additional print money, more so when the average national salary has considerably increased since. To that one has to also consider the effects of the inflation, with $100 in 1975 having the same purchase power as $466.97 in 2018. Does anyone truly believe the amount of gold held in federal treasury vaults has tripled since 1975?
Financial institutions have a tremendous influence over if not total control of the economy of the world and this way over the life of billions of working humans. Among others, the system will always generate significant profit for those who own significant capital, as well as a class of poor and financially insecure people, the work force that generates the profit enjoyed by those who control the capital. Earth-humans are trapped within this system. Once again, this is no accident and they are beginning to become aware of that. This happens to be bad news for the status quo, and it may end up throwing our civilization into chaos. This is why beginning with 2020 things would start to unravel, and why at the same time a path to a new way of existing was being more or less surreptitiously laid out as the people were globally paralyzed with fear.
Thursday, May 7, 2020
"Right now we’re in a moment of deep transformation in planetary awareness in which big changes are taken place, and many more are yet to come. Any transformation that’s important entails (hard to avoid) a profound crisis; and this crisis is, without a doubt, undermining the foundations of our civilization. Nevertheless, we are faced with an opportunity without precedent to approach a new developmental paradigm. We, and only we, the citizens of this planet, have the responsibility and the opportunity to change the course of history."
(A New Paradigm for a World in Crisis, Pepón Jover del Pozo, Exopolitics, July 2009, Barcelona, Spain)
The word change is thrown emphatically around by politicians on the campaign trail. Once the votes are counted most everyone forgets they mentioned it, but the next election cycle will use that trick again.
Rightfully so people always want change, and yet the expected improvement does not happen when promised or the way it was promised. This is because one of the main functions of a political form of government is to slow down progress to a crawl, especially since change tends to affect the existing order, to undermine "the foundations of our civilization." Most of the time this is done so society would not plunge into chaos, they say, and they are partially correct about that. Nevertheless, society does often end up in chaos anyway, and many a time this is because the protectors of the status quo do not allow for rational change to happen naturally.
The ability of all political systems of government, parliamentary republics where officials are democratically elected included, to control the population by dividing people into antagonistic groups is used by certain entities to manipulate the electorate to their benefit. When things go too far with the disregard for the multitudes, we have riots in the streets, social revolutions, or something similar to what we experience these days in America when corruption in the media, FBI, within our political, judicial system, and within the intelligence agencies is being exposed big time. Even though the mainstream media would report on nothing foreign affairs outside a volcano eruption or an airplane crush in the Far East, news seep into human consciousness in many other ways, and if you know how to read in between the lines one could see that something similar goes on all over the world.
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
"We were discussing here earlier the fact that the record of everything that ever happened in the history of Earth, of every thought entertained by Earth-humans is kept in what is known as the Akashic Records. This is possible because, as seen, everything in the universe is information carrying energy. Quantum physics suggests material reality is a manifestation of the constant interference between the high frequency information carrying energies of the metaphysical and the low frequency information carrying energies of the so-called material. From the point of view of a human observer the resulting interference pattern is made manifest by the way of our consciousness, a form of energy acting on these energies and causing them to collapse into what we now perceive as material forms.
Related to that since everything in the earth plane is cause and effect, every now and here is simultaneously an end and a beginning part of a potentially infinite cycle of perceived existential events. Our life story is a logical sequence of cause and effect events we choose to experience and also generate. Nothing happens by chance and everything has purpose. The meaning of that is there is always a rational logical explanation for and a good reason why we experience what we experience. A rational logical result of that, among others, it is perfectly possible to predict a possible outcome to our present activities and state of being.
We are not here aimlessly traveling between birth and death into a limited time/space reality. Our journey began long before we were born, we, as in our spirit energy have arrived here from other dimensions, from a place where after our current physical aspect expires we will return only to come back again when and if need it. The purpose of our being here is to experience enlightenment by the way of consciousness awareness growth, to ascend into a higher understanding of reality and this way into a higher dimension within the Natural Order of Creation.
Our being here is part of an extended process of discovery, of reconnecting with knowledge we were once separated from. Without any doubt, the current now and here is never an accident and the universe exists for the purpose of enabling our ascension."
- A Time of Change, Volume 2, Chapter 14, Subchapter "Our World Is A Fascinating Virtual Reality Event."
A Time of Change is an ample, under current circumstances underground book of knowledge. At this time the author intends to make it available here and possibly on other Internet platforms free of charge. Unless unforeseen events occur, the first of the tree volumes of the book will be released sometime this year. That will be followed by the individual release of the other two volumes over a span of twelve months. To know when the first volume comes out, enter your email address in the window provided on the home page. An announcement will be made at the time of its release.
Saturday, January 25, 2020
He might have not indented it this way but that does not excuse the fact that most everything Darwin states in this matter is extremely racist, narrow minded, and false. In The Descent of Man, he talks about inferior and superior races and claims human development was tributary to a vicious process of selection, of “the elimination of the slightly less well-endowed individuals.” Herbert Spencer would only rephrase what Darwin claimed in his book when he called it “survival of the fittest.” Indeed, contrary to what some are claiming today in Darwin's defense, Spencer’s catchy line is pure and unadulterated Darwinian nonsense.
The other question Darwin never addresses is the one about the origin of all those human races living today on planet Earth. Similar to what we have in the Bible, where the Old Testament god wants his chosen race to kill most everyone who does not swear obedience to him, Darwin’s humans live in a dog-eat-dog kind of world where races no one knowns where they came from fight each other for survival. That and the belief in the existence of favored races led to the emergence in the last decades of the 19th century, beginning of the 20th century of the science of eugenics.
Darwin is very clear, a clarity that does not allow for misinterpretations, and equally wrong when he speaks of “favoured races” and of better-endowed individuals of the same species causing some sort of natural selection among the population of the planet, something supposedly leading to the emergence of a superior human. The concept of eugenics was born out of that non-factual view, and this new science was supposed to be a way of creating the perfect human race. All a scientist had to do was eliminate the weaker, the less well-endowed individuals within our communities, as Darwin suggested it happens in nature, and the resulting superior race would have taken over the planet. At the surface it looked like a good, rational idea, reason why even some among the progressive cultural and political personalities of the time were enthusiastically embracing it. As it turned out, since the premises were false, it was actually a very bad idea.
Darwin was convinced the civilized nations would one day overcome and basically completely annihilate the so-called savage races. That nonsense would be soon put to a test and the results were devastating for civilization Earth. Among others, his irrational assumptions became the silent foundation for the ideology embraced by supremacist groups and an essential part of Hitler’s reasoning behind his final solution plan. To justify his crimes, Hitler would use the argument provided by German scientists who happened to be big supporters and practitioners of eugenics. The movement for race purity, however, did not start under the Nazi, or in Germany. It all began much earlier, in America.
In the 1860s and the 1870s, a certain Francis Galton put eugenics on the map, and many found it to be an attractive, a sound proposition. His passion for eugenics was the result of the influence exerted on him by his cousin’s recently published works on natural and racial selection, two best sellers the complete title of which read On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, and The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Indeed, his cousin was no other than Charles Darwin, and no one has ever heard him denouncing Francis’ work for being immoral, racist, and anti-social.
The eugenics movement gained notoriety in America when another Charles, Charles Davenport, created the International Federation of Eugenics Organizations. German scientists joined the institution, and the Swiss-born German psychiatrist and geneticist Ernst Rüdin became one of the presidents of IFEO. He was later appointed director of the Genealogical-Demographic Department at the German Institute for Psychiatric Research in Munich (1917-1945), and director of the German Society for Racial Hygiene of the Max Planck Institute for Brain Research.
A prominent figure of the scientific community, Rüdin is considered the father of the National Socialist Party’s ideology. In fact, he would end up writing the official racial policy of Nazi Germany.
A Time of Change will be released in 2020 under to be determined circumstances.
Monday, January 20, 2020
You may have heard this song performed by Andrea Bocelli or Luciano Pavaroti, and you may have even liked it. If you are a religious person, you may have liked even better, though you most likely did not know the story behind it. The real story, that is.
The title of the song, Panis Angelicus, translates Bread of Angels, and is a verse from a hymn called Sacris solemniis written in the 13th century by Thomas Aquinas. It was dedicated to the feast of Corpus Christi, the Solemnity of the Holy Body and Blood of Christ. While the lyrics of the song do not directly state the bread is the body of Christ, they imply it is, and this is obviously a reference to the passage in the Bible known as the last supper where the apostles are told the bread on the table is the body of Jesus and the wine in the cup is Jesus' blood. Pretty creepy if you think about it, but this is what the text says and this is what they preach in churches.
What most churchgoers do not know for they were never told is the real story. The ritual known in church Christianity as the Eucharist is based on two different non-Christian traditions that have nothing in common with the life of the one known under the name of Jesus (not his real name anyway).
At the time the Christian church was emerging after its founders, known as the Adversaries, as in the adversaries of true Christology abandoned the original, the secular Christian school of thought and Jesus' true teachings and message, the people were celebrating goddess Ceres, the patron of agriculture by making and eating bread cakes that supposedly represented the "body of the goddess." They were also celebrating god Dionysus by drinking wine that supposedly was "the blood of the god."
Indeed, the last supper story is a made up story. Related to that Jesus did not die on the cross, says the same Bible that also suggests he died on the cross at the age of 33, nor did he resurrect. In fact, as you are going to see in A Time of Change, there is absolutely nothing genuinely Christian in the Christianity of the church, or true, and that includes the term Christ.
In this instance the bishops have dishonestly appropriated two pagan traditions, replaced the pagan gods Ceres and Dionysus with pagan god Jesus so they could put the label Christian on what in reality was a plagiarized story, and then used it as a marketing tool to lure followers of other religions to the new and bigger religion in town.